Teams

ALMADEN VAC CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-25vs MORGAN HILL TC CM7.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesRaghu Bhat / Raphael Durst vs Manish Nautiyal / Ric Andres7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSergey Gitman / Muneer Waheed vs John Stephani / Malvin Mercado6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJaeyoung Lee / Dean Bell vs Paul Nguyen / Viet Trinh3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Nicolas Johnson
published
3.67
3.66
Sergey Gitman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Wei Han
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Bowen She
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.60
Raghu Bhat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Alan Kirchick
published 4
3.46
Raphael Durst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Suneel Sharma
published
3.25
Muneer Waheed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Gil Suh
published
3.15
Bijan Rafizadeh
published 3.5
2.78
Dean Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jaeyoung Lee
published
Michael Lauriola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vladimir Libershteyn + Raghu Bhat3247% games−4.8% vs expected
Raghu Bhat + Raphael Durst033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicolas Johnson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Vladimir Libershteyn
14W–33L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Sergey Gitman
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Wei Han
11W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Bowen She
21W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Raghu Bhat
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Alan Kirchick
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Raphael Durst
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Suneel Sharma
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Muneer Waheed
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Gil Suh
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Bijan Rafizadeh
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Dean Bell
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Jaeyoung Lee
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Lauriola
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.