Teams

Westwood Caudill/Dean

2025 Richmond Combo Weekday Women · Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-18vs HCC-D'AmbrosiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Dexter / Katherine Singleton vs Sharon Mugford / Cameron Sealey7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnnette King / Elizabeth O'Hare vs Virginia Berents / Jennifer McGeorge2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRenee Gilman / Jenny Sharrar vs Michelle Farrar / Amy Coates6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-14vs Ridgetop Scammell 6.5 WeekdayLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaren Payne / Karen Viverette vs Lindsey Scammell / Alden McDaniel3-6, 4-6
2025-11-11vs SCC Weisiger 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Zach / Allison Rosen vs Sarah Boyd / Regina Perkinson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Singleton / Karen Viverette vs Heather Benedetti / Betsy Gibson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Hamilton / Lauren Connor vs Colleen Weisiger / Brooke Gilbert2-6, 3-6
2025-11-06vs Hermitage - FisherLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaren Payne / Elizabeth Brogan vs Stephanie Yablonski / Samantha McLean4-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs ACAC Racquet Fuel-KastenWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaren Payne / Karen Viverette vs Anne Townsend / Jane Parrish4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-28vs MTC Combo Queens 6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKristin Zach / Allison Rosen vs Jeannie Langnau / Allie Hannon6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBecky Anthony / Elizabeth Brogan vs Nancy Reynolds / Suzanne Johnson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnnette King / Lauren Connor vs Anne Gilfillan / Amanda Phillips7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kristin Zach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kate Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Becky Anthony
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Meghan Dexter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jenny Sharrar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lauren Connor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Karen Viverette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Katherine Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Caren Payne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Renee Gilman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Allison Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Annette King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Elizabeth Brogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Donna Dean
published
Elizabeth O'Hare
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Zach
33W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kate Hamilton
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Becky Anthony
2W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Meghan Dexter
27W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jenny Sharrar
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Lauren Connor
38W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Karen Viverette
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Katherine Singleton
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Renee Gilman
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Allison Rosen
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Annette King
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Elizabeth Brogan
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Donna Dean
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth O'Hare
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.