Teams

Wilson - RS Hard

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-23vs Sparks - RS HardSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJill Wilson / Margaret Menear vs Jennifer Washington / Jacqueline Pommerening5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesStacy Wilks vs Michelle Washington6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCandy Zuleger / Marianna Massey vs Jill Sparks / Mary Canada4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Dixon / Kacee Bidnick vs Gretchen Miller / Sandra Ling6-2, 6-2
2026-04-16vs Holmes - RS HardWon 31
W#1 DoublesJill Wilson / Margaret Menear vs Kelli Filardi / Liliya Slutsker6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Burch vs Natalie Nguyen6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Frederick / Allison McCrory vs Kelly Geiger / Susan Schellin7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Regina Dixon vs Mary Pene / Libby Covington2-6, 3-6
2026-04-09vs Escambia/RossLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllison McCrory / Liz Payne vs Kimberly Fortier / Elizabeth Dudney2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStacy Wilks vs Natalia Burroughs4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Wilson / Margaret Menear vs Trish Kington / Kadi Taylor6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Debra Neethling / Malu Dunn1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-02vs Trawick - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiz Payne / Candy Zuleger vs Jen Swan / Monika Greene5-7, 4-6
2026-03-26vs Sparks - RS HardWon 31
W#1 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Jacqueline Pommerening / Jill Sparks6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Burch vs Gretchen Miller6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarianna Massey / Liz Payne vs PATRICIA Ghiglino / Sandra Ling6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMargaret Menear / Regina Dixon vs Mary Canada / Jennifer Washington2-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs Kirk - SHLLost 01
L#3 DoublesSheree Lombardo / Liz Payne vs Denny Rarrick / Mary Brann7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-03-12vs Holmes - RS HardWon 31
W#1 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Liliya Slutsker / Jessica Isakson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Burch vs Natalie Nguyen6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarianna Massey / Sheree Lombardo vs Kelli Filardi / Jennifer McCurdy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRegina Dixon / Stacy Wilks vs Kelly Geiger / Susan Schellin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Escambia/RossLost 04
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Candy Zuleger vs Kimberly Fortier / Elizabeth Dudney3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Diamond vs Jeanna Dulyanai6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSheree Lombardo / Marianna Massey vs Carolyn Moore / Kaye Whittenberger1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStacy Wilks / Janice Clark vs Kathy Ross / Malu Dunn6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Lauren Burch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Liz Payne
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Stacy Wilks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Jill Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Marianna Massey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Kacee Bidnick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Allison McCrory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Regina Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Candy Zuleger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Margaret Menear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Sheree Lombardo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janice Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Menear + Jill Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Liz Payne + Allison McCrory213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Burch
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Stacy Wilks
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Jill Wilson
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Marianna Massey
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Allison McCrory
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Regina Dixon
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Candy Zuleger
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Margaret Menear
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Sheree Lombardo
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Janice Clark
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.