Teams

LOTC-Rodegerdts

2023 Adult 70 & Over · Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Patricia Sturr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Gwen van Meter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2023-08-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Gwen van Meter vs Barbara Beck / Louanne Fuller6-4, 6-4
2023-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Gwen van Meter vs Barb Foster / Marlene Huntsinger6-1, 6-3
2023-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Julia Rea vs Cathryn Todd / Claire C Gates6-4, 6-2
2023-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Gwen van Meter vs Patricia Brink / Mary Sides6-4, 7-5
2023-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesGail Darby / Gwen van Meter vs Evelyne Cassell / Sally Sullivan6-2, 6-2
2023-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarilyn Alexander / Patricia Sturr vs Lindy Delf / Mary Mountain6-2, 6-2
2023-06-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGwen van Meter / Madeline Shotwell vs Judith Brauer / Shirley Derby6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Patricia Sturr
59W–77L career
not enough data
3
Gwen van Meter
27W–59L career
0%64%36%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.