Teams

KY/LEX/Castle

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sarah Knight
published
3.50
Jennifer Janes
published
3.44
Kirsten van Haaren
published
3.42
Cynthia Yeiser
published 3.5
3.41
Melinda McClain
published
3.38
Kristen Tewell
published
3.34
Linn Jefferson
published
3.32
3.24
Mily Ralsten
published
3.23
Shera Moulton
published
3.23
Kenda Moore
published
3.22
Janet Lewis
published
3.21
Connie Bishop
published 3.5
3.18
Catherine Leslie
published 3.5
3.17
Doris Senters
published
3.14
Lisa Castle
published
3.10
Cathy Corales
published 3.5
Laurie DeVore
published
Lee Ann Jung
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Knight + Doris Senters6162% games+5.8% vs expected
Doris Senters + Kirsten van Haaren9258% games+5.5% vs expected
Melinda McClain + Doris Senters13162% games+5.1% vs expected
Kristen Tewell + Doris Senters6351% games−0.2% vs expected
Linn Jefferson + Margaret de Movellan4551% games−4.6% vs expected
Mily Ralsten + Doris Senters224 matchesnot enough data
Connie Bishop + Lisa Castle213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Castle + Sarah Knight213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Knight
23W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jennifer Janes
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kirsten van Haaren
30W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Cynthia Yeiser
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Melinda McClain
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Kristen Tewell
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Linn Jefferson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Margaret de Movellan
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Mily Ralsten
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Shera Moulton
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kenda Moore
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Janet Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Connie Bishop
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Catherine Leslie
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Doris Senters
60W–44L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Lisa Castle
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cathy Corales
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
Laurie DeVore
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Ann Jung
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Hollingshead
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.