Teams

Howard/Ludwig 40+ S23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-19vs Stordahl 40+ 3.5 S23Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Micek / Pam Howard vs Pam Bowden / Heidi Kapacinskas6-4, 3-1
2023-06-14vs Rosenbery 40+ S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / LISA PECK vs Tasha Flikeid / Victoria Maas6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-31vs Landrus 40+ S23Won 10
W#2 DoublesCharlyn Francisco / Pam Howard vs Ann Hawkins / Jean Larson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-17vs Stordahl 40+ 3.5 S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Arel / Pam Howard vs Pam Bowden / Julie Whittington5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Martha Long
published
3.38
Jennifer Goedde
published
3.34
Elizabeth Micek
published
3.29
Lisa Meccia
published
3.27
LISA PECK
published
3.27
Charlyn Francisco
published 3.5
Connie Brockway
published 3.5
3.24
Stacy Ludwig
published
3.18
Megan Brinkman
published
3.17
Beth Arel
published 3.5
3.11
Kari Tarpey
published
3.09
Pam Howard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Karen Dewing
published
Jennifer Katz
published
Kathy Houser
published
Kerrie Hecker
published
Nikki Fahey
published
Paula Riggi
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Long
51W–46L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Jennifer Goedde
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Elizabeth Micek
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Lisa Meccia
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
LISA PECK
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Charlyn Francisco
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Connie Brockway
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacy Ludwig
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Megan Brinkman
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Beth Arel
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Kari Tarpey
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Pam Howard
172W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
Karen Dewing
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.94
Jennifer Katz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Houser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerrie Hecker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nikki Fahey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Riggi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.