Teams

Smith - Honey Deuces

2025 Hampton Roads Combo · Hampton Roads Combo 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-20vs Kulas - Kicking AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Alyse Chickey / Kristina Chastain0-6, 1-6
2025-11-13vs Sawyer CummingsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Holli Sawyer / Catherine McDonald0-6, 4-6
2025-11-06vs Hoffman-SchmitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Pervaneh Child / Carol Branch5-7, 3-6
2025-10-23vs KezmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Anastasia Kezman / Julie Soriano0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMerritt Keffer / Chelsea Jennings vs Tessa Robinson / Kathryn Kramer4-6, 6-7
2025-10-09vs Sawyer CummingsLost 01
L#3 DoublesFlorinda Cudiamat / Chelsea Jennings vs Holli Sawyer / Cary Kelly2-6, 4-6
2025-10-02vs Hoffman-SchmitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Mary Snowden-Gordon / Diane Osborne Yates6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kathryn Fraim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Chelsea Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Carrie Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Seretis
published
3.10
Merritt Keffer
published
3.09
Karla Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Florinda Cudiamat
published 3.5
Heather Richter
published
Paula Fridley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Coleman + Kathryn Fraim11655% games+3.0% vs expected
Karla Smith + Paula Fridley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathryn Fraim
72W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Chelsea Jennings
70W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Carrie Coleman
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Pamela Seretis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Merritt Keffer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karla Smith
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Florinda Cudiamat
24W–33L career · type S · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
Heather Richter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Fridley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.