Teams

Refunds

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Refunds

17 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
SHARON WELLS
published 4
3.74
James Epler
published 4
3.45
Brett Bender
published 3.5
3.39
Karen Ray
published 3.5
3.28
Alison Pangilinan
published 3.5
3.25
Ranjith Rajadurai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Nancy Bessler
published 3
2.96
Lori Eason
published 3
2.90
Cheryl Strouse
published 3
2.88
Deedee Beem
published 3
2.86
Kelly Grathwohl
published 3
2.86
Cindy Plua
published 3
2.70
Tina Krohn
published
2.67
Amy English
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
April Buttner
published 3
2.38
Kimberly Varshine
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Louise Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Strouse + Deedee Beem3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
SHARON WELLS
119W–49L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
James Epler
67W–70L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
3.5
Brett Bender
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Karen Ray
105W–157L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Alison Pangilinan
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Ranjith Rajadurai
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Nancy Bessler
91W–75L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Lori Eason
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Cheryl Strouse
17W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Deedee Beem
29W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Kelly Grathwohl
91W–118L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cindy Plua
54W–50L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Tina Krohn
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Amy English
37W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
April Buttner
32W–53L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Kimberly Varshine
29W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Louise Brown
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.