← Teams

MAC-Cofield/Ackroyd

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 2.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Amos Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Scott Soot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Ron Eiseman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Fred Buller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Sally Papadimas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Joy Heinecke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Ellen Wood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Gary Hallmark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Jane Crisan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-03-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesErik Garcia / Dorothy Cofield vs Abby Guttormsen / Erik Guttormsen6-4, 6-3
2024-03-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Fred Buller vs Brian DuVal / Lucia Parker6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSally Papadimas / Gary Hallmark vs Michelle Boucher / Michael Gentry5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Wood / Ron Eiseman vs Sarah Sasek / Ken Naffziger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAmos Shepard / Ellen Wood vs Geri Marcus / Justin Foster5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFred Buller / Debbie Ackroyd vs Dennis Pelton / Stephanie Pelton6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoy Heinecke / Ron Eiseman vs Abby Guttormsen / Erik Guttormsen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRon Eiseman / Ellen Wood vs Chris Hartson / SHAWNA THOMPSON6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGary Hallmark / Sally Papadimas vs Greg Arendt / Karla Hendrickson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErik Garcia / Joy Heinecke vs Doug Cumming / Bess Jacobo6-1, 6-2
2024-02-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSally Papadimas / Amos Shepard vs Melissa Tom / Dave Sato7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEllen Wood / Tim Jakubowski vs Claudia Porter / Kyle Kim3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Fred Buller vs Kimberly Shaffer / Rodney Johnson6-3, 6-2
2024-02-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Tim Jakubowski vs Erik Bucher / Maria Siri6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Korkowski / Scott Soot vs Shan Randall / Cheri Mosbrucker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErik Garcia / Jane Crisan vs Megan McCarter / Deon Logan6-0, 6-1
2024-01-28Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesAmos Shepard / Debbie Ackroyd vs Aera Seo / Shik Ahn6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGary Hallmark / Jane Crisan vs Dawan Pandya / Yongseok Cheon6-1, 6-0
2024-01-21Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAmos Shepard / Ellen Wood vs Terry Bennett / Wendy Vail6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesFred Buller / Joy Heinecke vs Eric Heredia / Anita Heredia6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Amos Shepard
30W–10L career
not enough data
—
3
Scott Soot
35W–43L career
1%98%2%
2.81
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76
3
Ron Eiseman
6W–43L career
not enough data
—
3
Fred Buller
22W–18L career
10%88%2%
2.70
3
Sally Papadimas
48W–101L career
9%91%0%
2.64
3
Joy Heinecke
27W–37L career
11%89%0%
2.61
3
Ellen Wood
43W–79L career · type A
20%80%0%
2.56
2.5
Gary Hallmark
9W–18L career
not enough data
—
2.5
Jane Crisan
5W–28L career
0%94%6%
2.23

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.