Teams

Hughes

2025 Hampton Roads Singles · Hampton Roads Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-17vs Pepe ChorazyLost 12
L#1 SinglesJackie Andrews vs Kara Pepe4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShannon Dupre vs Faye Downey6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJennifer Ziemer vs Katie Kubichan2-6, 0-6
2025-11-15vs Pepe ChorazyLost 12
L#1 SinglesTonya Krecker vs Kara Pepe3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSusan Genzler vs Kelsey O'Hanlon4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLisbet Hughes vs Katie Kubichan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-03vs Pepe ChorazyLost 03
L#1 SinglesShannon Dupre vs Kelsey O'Hanlon1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLisbet Hughes vs Kara Pepe4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJackie Andrews vs Paige Welch2-6, 4-6
2025-10-27vs Pepe ChorazyLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ziemer vs Paige Welch1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Genzler vs Kelsey O'Hanlon1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTonya Krecker vs Kara Pepe6-7, 6-7
2025-10-20vs Pepe ChorazyLost 02
L#1 SinglesJackie Andrews vs Kelsey O'Hanlon0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLisbet Hughes vs Kara Pepe5-7, 3-6
2025-10-15vs Pepe ChorazyLost 12
L#1 SinglesJackie Andrews vs Kelsey O'Hanlon1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesShannon Dupre vs Katie Kubichan6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJennifer Ziemer vs Faye Downey2-6, 0-6
2025-10-06vs Pepe ChorazyWon 21
L#1 SinglesSusan Genzler vs Paige Welch6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShannon Dupre vs Kara Pepe6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesTonya Krecker vs Faye Downey6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Shannon Dupre
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.91
Susan Genzler
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Lisbet Hughes
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Jackie Andrews
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.62
Tonya Krecker
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Jennifer Ziemer
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisbet Hughes + Susan Genzler3347% games+4.9% vs expected
Tonya Krecker + Susan Genzler2541% games−1.4% vs expected
Tonya Krecker + Jackie Andrews134 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Krecker + Jennifer Ziemer134 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Andrews + Lisbet Hughes134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Genzler + Jennifer Ziemer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Dupre
30W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Susan Genzler
31W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Lisbet Hughes
25W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Jackie Andrews
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Tonya Krecker
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
Jennifer Ziemer
13W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.