Teams

MI-Ace of Base-Nowakowski

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-26vs PSC-HeraWon 50
W#1 DoublesBrandy Nordstrom / Sharon Singh vs Ann Rae Smith / Marni Mills6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulia Bai vs Marisa Webb6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKrista Nowakowski / Suzanne Vannatter vs Raluca Hera / Mihaela Frintu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMaggie Pierson vs Nellie Jie6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Chu / Nandita Parikh vs Deanna Thompson / Jennifer Baum6-2, 6-0
2026-05-22vs RBW-No Regrets Season 2-KimLost 23
L#1 DoublesSkylar Sherwood / Tammy Chu vs Yuni Kwon / Lisa C4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJulia Bai vs Jerry Kim6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKrista Nowakowski / Suzanne Vannatter vs Kristine Kleinsmith / Sherry Kebeck6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRae Wang vs Erina Sugai0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Singh / Nita Khandelwal vs Shoshanna Wilbur / Viorica Leonte2-6, 3-6
2026-05-19vs TCSP-Netchix-SwansonWon 50
W#1 DoublesTammy Chu / Krista Nowakowski vs Shannon Garbaccio / Carrie Barrios6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaggie Pierson vs Alexa Crawford6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Vannatter / Veena Shankaran vs Lorraine Whelan / Elizabeth Kardokus7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesBrandy Nordstrom vs Jane Seibel6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNandita Parikh / Rae Wang vs Beth Swanson / Emily Alhadeff6-1, 6-1
2026-05-12vs HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-IkedaLost 23
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Vannatter / Skylar Sherwood vs Ali Jones - (DQ) / Christie Vandyke3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRae Wang vs Gegi Ward2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Singh / Margie Starnes vs Nichole Ikeda / Sarah Bierlink2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJulia Bai vs Jenni Clay6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKrista Nowakowski / Maggie Pierson vs Julie Martin / Hannah Smolinski4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs ETC-LoWon 41
W#1 DoublesSkylar Sherwood / Tammy Chu vs Deb Holbrook / Aliya Khan7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulia Bai vs Susan Iverson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Vannatter / Veena Shankaran vs Debbie Lo / Jeanie Richardson6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMaggie Pierson vs Kristin Pascal6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNita Khandelwal / Dolly Ivanov vs Connie Cho / Isi Owoo4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-05-05vs CP-Victorious-Dauphiny BeckerWon 32
W#1 DoublesDolly Ivanov / Suzanne Vannatter vs Dana Laursen / Michelle Dauphiny Becker4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaggie Pierson vs Chandler Wadsworth7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKrista Nowakowski / Sharon Singh vs Mary Czerwinski / Shelly Enstrom6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrandy Nordstrom vs Mary Jean Waite2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLacey Tacher / Lindsay Goode vs Chandra Pandey / Linda Greenlaw2-2
2026-04-22vs TCSP-Alleycats-MurchWon 32
W#1 DoublesDolly Ivanov / Suzanne Vannatter vs Jill Murphy / Heather Thorne7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJulia Bai vs Maura Dunn6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSharon Singh / Margie Starnes vs Kristen Sycamore / Paulette Boyle6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRae Wang vs Isabelle Ochsner3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVeena Shankaran / Brandy Nordstrom vs Katie Traverse / Holly Norris1-6, 4-6
2026-04-07vs BC-Terminetters-McGuireWon 41
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Vannatter / Julia Bai vs Kate Gilham / Veronica Golden6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSkylar Sherwood vs Amy Franck6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Singh / Margie Starnes vs Betsy Chamberlin / Flora Wilson3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMaggie Pierson vs Sunny Lee6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLindsay Goode / Brandy Nordstrom vs Cori Durrant / Eliza Cha6-1, 6-1
2026-03-31vs BTA-UtterWon 50
W#1 DoublesSkylar Sherwood / Krista Nowakowski vs Cathy Wong / Ying-Chen Liu6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRae Wang vs Annette de Soto6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDolly Ivanov / Nandita Parikh vs Kiyeun Kim / Hongjuan Zhang7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMaggie Pierson vs Sarah Utter6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLacey Tacher / Lindsay Goode vs Terri Catalani / Wai Man Cheng6-1, 6-1
2026-03-24vs STC-ManumWon 50
W#1 DoublesSharon Singh / Dolly Ivanov vs Rives Kitchell / Abby Wagner6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRae Wang vs Amelia Manum6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Vannatter / Brandy Nordstrom vs Jennifer Higgins / Shana Perrina6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLacey Tacher vs Leslie Chihuly6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNita Khandelwal / Nandita Parikh vs Jenny Wyatt / Caroline Wagner6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Julia Bai
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.15
Tammy Chu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Skylar Sherwood
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.89
Dolly Ivanov
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Krista Nowakowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Suzanne Vannatter
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.84
Maggie Pierson
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.83
Lacey Tacher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.79
Rae Wang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Nandita Parikh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Lindsay Goode
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Nita Khandelwal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Sharon Singh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.62
Veena Shankaran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Margie Starnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Brandy Nordstrom
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Lily Oshea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolly Ivanov + Nandita Parikh5067% games+14.4% vs expected
Krista Nowakowski + Suzanne Vannatter8263% games+9.7% vs expected
Nita Khandelwal + Tammy Chu5255% games+8.5% vs expected
Margie Starnes + Sharon Singh3258% games+2.1% vs expected
Dolly Ivanov + Krista Nowakowski6263% gamesnot enough data
Krista Nowakowski + Skylar Sherwood404 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Vannatter + Veena Shankaran314 matchesnot enough data
Dolly Ivanov + Suzanne Vannatter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Julia Bai
48W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Tammy Chu
30W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Skylar Sherwood
80W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Dolly Ivanov
34W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Krista Nowakowski
51W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Suzanne Vannatter
39W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Maggie Pierson
9W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Lacey Tacher
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Rae Wang
28W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Nandita Parikh
29W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Lindsay Goode
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Nita Khandelwal
11W–14L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Sharon Singh
10W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Veena Shankaran
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Margie Starnes
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Brandy Nordstrom
21W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lily Oshea
21W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.