Teams

MCTA18/Yanko/RHTC

Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Women - 2.5

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-31vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDebi Combis / Jenn Yanko vs Holly Tesimale / Jana Yeoman2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLoren Burris vs Cynthia Mitsumasu6-2, 6-3
2026-03-24vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Won 21
W#1 DoublesVeena Sehgal / Jenn Yanko vs Crystal Lee / Otishia Pinson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLoren Burris vs Cynthia Mitsumasu6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebi Combis / Rebecca Musante vs STACEY SUMMERS / Alicia Utt2-6, 1-6
2026-03-17vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Split 11
W#1 SinglesLoren Burris vs Cynthia Mitsumasu6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Price / Jenn Yanko vs Crystal Lee / Otishia Pinson4-6, 2-6
2026-03-10vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLoren Burris / Veena Sehgal vs Holly Tesimale / Jana Yeoman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Musante vs Cynthia Mitsumasu3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebi Combis / Laudi Adkinson vs STACEY SUMMERS / Alicia Utt1-6, 1-6
2026-03-03vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Won 21
L#1 DoublesDebi Combis / Sarah Price vs Jana Yeoman / Holly Tesimale0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Musante vs Alicia Utt6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLoren Burris / Jenn Yanko vs Crystal Lee / Cynthia Mitsumasu6-1, 6-4
2026-02-24vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJenn Yanko / Rebecca Musante vs Otishia Pinson / Alicia Utt3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLoren Burris vs Cynthia Mitsumasu6-3, 6-4
2026-02-17vs MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLaudi Adkinson / Jenn Yanko vs Jana Yeoman / Holly Tesimale4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Musante vs Cynthia Mitsumasu6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Adult Women - 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTA 2.5W 18 & Over (Utt)4313818163
2MCTA18/Yanko/RHTC3481327211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Loren Burris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.30
Jenn Yanko
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.25
Rebecca Musante
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.82
Debi Combis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kimberly Ozmon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenn Yanko + Loren Burris4162% games+8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Loren Burris
21W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Jenn Yanko
34W–54L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Rebecca Musante
8W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Debi Combis
2W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Kimberly Ozmon
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.