Teams

Hunters Green - E. Vickers

2023 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.28 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesJian Sun / Erin Vickers vs Victoria Peralta / Sylvie Derksen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Bitting / Nikki Spirakis vs Patti Heid / Amanda Pitts6-1, 6-3
2023-08-12vs Hills/G. Burke/18&Over6.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanene Culumber / Karen Cleland vs Beth Hart / Lacy Gregory3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Bitting / Nikki Spirakis vs Geri Burke / Rebecca Gaier6-2, 6-4
2023-08-05vs Buckhorn Smart Aces - K. HeybroekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlecia Collins / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Deb Spears / Ginger Anzalone2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJian Sun / Sherry Peterson vs Sheryl Schumacher / Carol Guido6-3, 6-2
2023-07-29vs HCC Happy Hitters - R. DiVincentWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Vickers / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Carla Velasquez / Kelly Wroten6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Sakre / Nikki Spirakis vs Jennifer Mangieri / Kathy Skonieczny7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Coston / Sherry Peterson vs Renee DiVincent / Jeanne Ann Killam6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Janene Culumber vs Michelle Hare / Keli Gariani2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJian Sun / Lisa Bitting vs Debbie Hirth / Crystal Shanique Bethel6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Coston / Carmen Heggen vs Jennifer Carlson / Lisa Strickland7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Sakre / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Kimberly Funk / Sylvie Derksen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-13vs Hills/G. Burke/18&Over6.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Bitting / Nikki Spirakis vs Joan Whitten / Lacy Gregory7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanene Culumber / Sherry Peterson vs Caralyn Paul / AMY ISAAC3-6, 4-6
2023-07-01vs Buckhorn Smart Aces - K. HeybroekLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Herrion / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Danielle Cunningham / Deb Spears7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Bitting / Nikki Spirakis vs Pam Smith / Becky Meidt6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Sakre / Karen Cleland vs Sheryl Schumacher / Monica Eiermann1-6, 4-6
2023-06-24vs HCC Happy Hitters - R. DiVincentSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanene Culumber / Sherry Peterson vs Esthela Gonzalez / Jeanne Ann Killam3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Gabora / Tricia Cardoso vs Renee DiVincent / Amy Schnackenberg4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlecia Collins / Jian Sun vs Barbara Brosch / Elaine Deval6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Julie Sakre
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Eileen de Perello
published 3.5
3.25
Ann Coston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Bitting
published
3.17
Janene Culumber
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
3.10
Jian Sun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Elizabeth Dasilva
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Nikki Spirakis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Sherry Peterson
published
2.71
Hannah Gabora
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.52
Karen Cleland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Coston + Janene Culumber7556% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Dasilva + Nikki Spirakis7255% gamesnot enough data
Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Cardoso + Nikki Spirakis5159% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Dasilva + Julie Sakre4257% gamesnot enough data
Julie Sakre + Nikki Spirakis3356% gamesnot enough data
Ann Coston + Julie Sakre3265% gamesnot enough data
Jian Sun + Nikki Spirakis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julie Sakre
154W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Eileen de Perello
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ann Coston
119W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Bitting
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Janene Culumber
67W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Jian Sun
130W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Nikki Spirakis
120W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Hannah Gabora
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.