Teams

FTA18C/HollyTree/Schlarb

FTA COMBO 18 & OVER Night · 7.5 Women - Monday nights

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Monday nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Danielle Beckerle
published 4.5
3.72
Cali Rusk
published 4
3.71
Danielle Morelli
published 4
3.65
Natalie Bieber
published
3.52
Vera McCray
published
3.51
Michelle Sykes
published
3.46
Abbie Foster
published 4
3.45
Carol Rabel
published 4
3.31
Elizabeth Bowman
published
3.26
Maren Mueller
published
3.26
Gera Mort
published
Cybil Nielsen
published 3.5
3.22
Nancy Dreiding
published
3.15
Taunya Haun
published
3.01
Naomi Kozawa
published
2.93
Michelle Weston
published
2.87
Jean Kleis
published
2.83
Theresa Schlarb
published
Jordan Haun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sykes + Danielle Beckerle5157% games+12.9% vs expected
Carol Rabel + Nancy Dreiding3348% games+4.3% vs expected
Taunya Haun + Jean Kleis3646% games−5.5% vs expected
Michelle Sykes + Gera Mort5351% games−9.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Bowman + Vera McCray3255% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bowman + Carol Rabel404 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bowman + Nancy Dreiding134 matchesnot enough data
Vera McCray + Carol Rabel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle Beckerle
30W–13L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Cali Rusk
24W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Danielle Morelli
31W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Natalie Bieber
39W–20L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Vera McCray
40W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
Michelle Sykes
56W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
4
Abbie Foster
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Carol Rabel
39W–33L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Elizabeth Bowman
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.31
Maren Mueller
28W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Gera Mort
18W–27L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cybil Nielsen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Dreiding
25W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
Taunya Haun
26W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
Naomi Kozawa
38W–30L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Michelle Weston
22W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
Jean Kleis
28W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Theresa Schlarb
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Jordan Haun
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.