Teams

Westwood Lemco Tri

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-23vs Willow Oaks - BresslerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHarry Turton / John Strickler vs Andy Tucker / Scott Boyle6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesProcter Fishburne / Robert Teele vs Bernly Bressler / Alex Burnett6-1, 6-0
2025-09-17vs Westwood BrickleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesShailesh Khatri / Zachary Walton vs Chris Gerecke / Jacob Dyer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHarry Turton / Carter Berry vs James Fernald / Patrick Murtaugh3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLonnie Lemco / Kevin Gill vs Bailey White / Joseph Jones4-6, 4-6
2025-09-09vs CCV PriceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKennon Harrison / Procter Fishburne vs Ty Wellford / Joseph Parker2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKevin Gill / Brandon Herrin vs Chris Price / Adam Martin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Ridgetoppers - RobertsWon 30
W#1 DoublesShailesh Khatri / James Faulstich vs Doug Blouch / Bob Riggs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Teele / Procter Fishburne vs Jeff Given / Clem Ulrichs7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Grossman / Joel Horning vs Robert Mercurio / Sam Berg3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-21vs MTC Miracle Badgers - MarksLost 03
L#1 DoublesZachary Walton / James Faulstich vs Aaron Lawhorne / Christopher Kochensparger7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKennon Harrison / Robert Teele vs Alexander Feldman / Niell Jacobsen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Grossman / Lonnie Lemco vs Paul Bannister / Caleb Geoghegan3-6, 6-7
2025-08-12vs Kanawha J WalekWon 21
L#1 DoublesShailesh Khatri / Zachary Walton vs Jon Kilberg / Peyton Bowman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Faulstich / Kennon Harrison vs Creighton Anders / Elliott Gravitt7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoel Horning / Anthony Cargiulo vs CLIFFORD BRIDGE / Shaun Malik5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-08-05vs Hermitage - BetzLost 02
L#2 DoublesProcter Fishburne / Robert Teele vs Daniel Essad / Mark Westman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Cargiulo / Lonnie Lemco vs Gray Booker / Turner Broughton1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Zachary Walton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Shailesh Khatri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Carter Berry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Kevin Gill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Procter Fishburne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Brandon Herrin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Anthony Cargiulo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Kennon Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Harry Turton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brandon Covey
published 3.5
3.15
Robert Teele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
James Faulstich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
John Szalay
published
3.08
Joel Horning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lonnie Lemco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Strickler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shailesh Khatri + Zachary Walton224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Teele + Procter Fishburne213 matchesnot enough data
Joel Horning + Anthony Cargiulo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Walton
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Shailesh Khatri
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Christopher Caputo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carter Berry
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kevin Gill
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Procter Fishburne
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Brandon Herrin
21W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anthony Cargiulo
22W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kennon Harrison
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Harry Turton
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brandon Covey
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Teele
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
James Faulstich
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
John Szalay
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Joel Horning
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lonnie Lemco
13W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
John Strickler
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maj Thomas Bridenstine
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.