Teams

LOCH.Eheman

2025 CTRL Tri-Level 40 & Over · Tri-Level 40 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs CAS.DeAngelisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCecilia Edgar / Sharon Poindexter vs Ann Locher / Nicole Shaffer1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Pam Letts vs Jennie Yeung / Danielle Lamson6-2, 6-0
2025-07-22vs ACP.YounkinLost 02
L#1 DoublesCecilia Edgar / Sharon Poindexter vs Cyndy Fettig / Vivian Neto3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Chen / Lisa Capetanos vs Julie Pedraza / Jenn Hartner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-16vs PW.KraftLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Saenz / Cecilia Edgar vs Isabella Griffa / Hollis Mertens3-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs MD.TanakaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Saenz / Susan Hoffman vs Hillary Parnell / Karen Merchant4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Kristin Anderson vs Jessica Tanaka / Lindsey High6-0, 6-1
2025-07-01vs CAS.DeAngelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Dulin / Cecilia Edgar vs Ann Locher / Michiyo Pedersen0-6, 1-6
2025-06-17vs ACP.YounkinLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Saenz / Jennifer Dulin vs Maya Ress / Vivian Neto0-6, 0-6
2025-06-10vs PW.KraftLost 02
L#1 DoublesSharon Poindexter / Cecilia Edgar vs Penny Kraft / Hollis Mertens6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Rex / Lisa Capetanos vs Melissa Penabad / Andrea Agee6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-03vs MD.TanakaWon 10
W#3 DoublesWendy Chen / Lisa Capetanos vs Nikki Thigpen / Jonay Zies6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 40 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Lisa Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Sharon Poindexter
published
2.82
Lisa Capetanos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Cecilia Edgar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Jennifer Dulin
published
2.37
Wendy Chen
published
2.35
Andrea Finucane
published 2.5
2.21
Pam Letts
published
Jena Hill
published
Kim Eheman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Finucane + Pam Letts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Saenz
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Lisa Capetanos
41W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cecilia Edgar
284W–255L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Jennifer Dulin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Wendy Chen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Andrea Finucane
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Pam Letts
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Jena Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Eheman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.