← Teams

N OR-THPRD-Van

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
TRIET NGUYEN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
James Takahashi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Janet Ha
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Johan Hong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Larry Van
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
THAO VAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Betty Roux
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Zhong Lei
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Catherine Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Amy Mai
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results10 ties
2022-12-10Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesTRIET NGUYEN / Amy Mai vs Robert Glenn / Roxanna Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-12-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTRIET NGUYEN / Amy Mai vs Jessica Meyer / Greg Meyer6-1, 6-0
2022-11-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Huang / Robert Truong vs Audrey Weil / Blake Simonsen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Tu / Zhong Lei vs Jessica Hutchins / David Prescott6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Mai / TRIET NGUYEN vs Shannon Davis / Adam Crosson6-1, 6-2
2022-10-29Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTRIET NGUYEN / Lei Ma vs Brian Patrick / Victoria Cartwright6-2, 7-6
2022-10-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLarry Van / Mai-Anh Nguyen vs Kimberly Downie / Skip Potter5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZhong Lei / Betty Roux vs Heather Dale / Dave Ostby6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohan Hong / Amy Mai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-15Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLarry Van / Catherine Huang vs Charles Ruhsenberger / Penny Langhammer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Takahashi / Janet Ha vs Jennifer Pultz / David Floyd2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLarry Van / Amy Mai vs Audrey Weil / Blake Simonsen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Ha / James Takahashi vs Joanna Asia Wagner / Paul Kim6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohan Hong / Betty Roux vs Shannon Davis / Michael McTague6-4, 6-2
2022-10-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTRIET NGUYEN / Catherine Huang vs Lupine Swanson / Seth Yount6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesArun Eachambadi / Betty Roux vs Jane King Ayers / Eric Ayers6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesZhong Lei / THAO VAN vs Jing Li / Ian Schnadig3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJames Takahashi / Janet Ha vs Moshe Menashe / Li Tang6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohan Hong / Betty Roux vs Alireza Bayestehtashk / Julia Daigneault6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTRIET NGUYEN / Lei Ma vs Warren Wang / Minnie Bautista3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLarry Van / Catherine Huang vs Lucila Griesser / Mark Beilstein7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Takahashi / Janet Ha vs Victoria Cartwright / Steven Furusho6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesArun Eachambadi / THAO VAN vs SHAWNA THOMPSON / Dave Gillard7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
TRIET NGUYEN
89W–37L career
0%99%0%
3.77
3.5
James Takahashi
101W–39L career
0%96%4%
3.39
3.5
Janet Ha
105W–56L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Johan Hong
79W–53L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Larry Van
53W–28L career
not enough data
—
3
THAO VAN
62W–28L career
0%51%49%
3.11
3.5
Betty Roux
101W–106L career · type A
18%82%0%
3.08
3.5
Zhong Lei
65W–39L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Catherine Huang
94W–61L career
0%94%6%
2.91
0
Amy Mai
15W–13L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.