Teams

RCCB - Hingle

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Kerry Sawyer
published
3.07
Jennifer Bailey
published
2.89
Lindsay Nichols
published
2.70
Ruthan Tattersall
published
2.55
Katherine Hingle
published
2.48
Eileen Bentley
published
2.48
Alicia Sucre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.47
2.44
Catalina Calvert
published 2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
published 2.5
Clara Parsons
published 2.5
2.20
Joanne Ludwig
published
MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Sawyer + Lindsay Nichols3263% games+6.8% vs expected
Ruthan Tattersall + Katherine Hingle4257% games+5.7% vs expected
Kerry Sawyer + Catalina Calvert404 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Sawyer + Ruthan Tattersall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Sawyer
39W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
Jennifer Bailey
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Lindsay Nichols
33W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Ruthan Tattersall
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Katherine Hingle
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Eileen Bentley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Alicia Sucre
28W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
3
Christy Galzerano
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Catalina Calvert
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.44
2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Clara Parsons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joanne Ludwig
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.