Teams

KMcWhorter-HVCC

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-06vs TCrowley-CHTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmy Herman vs Katy Patton6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Destiny Lopez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnne Confer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-29vs KTravis-HRWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnne Confer vs Gayathri Rajaraman6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Herman vs Lindsay Stanek6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Pilneyo Seo4-6, 0-2
2026-06-22vs MLong-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmy Herman vs Sandra Truitt6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Melissa Daubert3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Richelle Robinson6-1, 6-3
2026-06-15vs GLoFrese-TOCHSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnne Confer vs Lindsey Wu6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Diane Allen3-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs CMurray-HRWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmy Herman vs Connie Brown6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAnne Confer vs Jennifer Dunlap6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCecily Peterson vs CLARE MURRAY6-1, 6-1
2026-05-18vs KLaan-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Elizabeth Chan3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Laurie Straube4-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs MLong-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Herman vs RANEE KUMAR6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Joan St Laurent6-2, 6-3
2026-05-05vs KTravis-HRSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Lindsay Stanek6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Kelly Travis0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Amy Herman
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.58
Kim McWhorter
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Lora Alkhawam
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Anne Confer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Hadley Nixon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Cecily Peterson
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McWhorter + Anne Confer5356% games+7.6% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Lora Alkhawam10266% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Herman
29W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Lora Alkhawam
88W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Anne Confer
43W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Cecily Peterson
209W–207L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.