Teams

SD WE LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Stacy

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles SD · SDNC WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kristine Nguyen
published
3.59
3.44
Julie Wood
published
3.35
Lisa Carey
published
3.32
Christine Pham
published 3.5
3.31
Michelle VANN
published 3.5
3.23
Karen Sahd
published 3.5
3.10
Shirley Park
published
3.08
Valerie Puscasiu
published
3.06
Jo Ann Stewart
published
2.73
Grace Daly
published 3
2.71
Elayne Berman
published 3
2.66
Laura Stacy
published
2.63
Karen Axmann
published 3
Ruth Hoffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elayne Berman + Karen Axmann2434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Nguyen
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Charlotte Francovalle
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Julie Wood
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lisa Carey
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Christine Pham
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Michelle VANN
67W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Karen Sahd
52W–66L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Shirley Park
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Valerie Puscasiu
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
Jo Ann Stewart
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Grace Daly
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elayne Berman
70W–62L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Laura Stacy
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Karen Axmann
46W–68L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Ruth Hoffman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.