Teams

LKHA-Hastings/Westport Deuces Wild

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 5.5 Men Thurs PM 40s

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-16vs LJTH-Theisen/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesKenny Hastings / Josh Henley vs Gian Sarolli / David Peeler6-2, 6-3
2025-10-09vs LSRU-Russell-Emlong/LNRCLost 01
L#2 DoublesIan Elliott / Josh Henley vs Mark Hamm / Brian Jenkins3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-02vs LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pmLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Wendt / Kenny Hastings vs David Bergeron / Stu Story2-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs LJTH-Theisen/NMPLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenny Hastings / John Lombard vs Jeff Reiner / Lou Raymond4-6
2025-09-18vs LSRU-Russell-Emlong/LNRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJosh Henley / Ian Elliott vs Sam Russell / Richard Langone3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKenny Hastings / Eddie Ewing vs Mark Hamm / Justin Larsen5-7, 1-6
2025-09-11vs LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pmLost 01
L#3 DoublesKenny Hastings / Ian Elliott vs Michael Raynor / Kendall Reische1-6, 3-6
2025-08-28vs LSRU-Russell-Emlong/LNRCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIan Elliott / Josh Henley vs Mark Hamm / Jim Staley6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRalf Strauss / Kenny Hastings vs Drew Porcello / Ryan Neufeld6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-21vs LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pmSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKenny Hastings / Ralf Strauss vs Ken Kuly / Stu Story6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJosh Henley / Ian Elliott vs David Bergeron / Baxter Price6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men Thurs PM 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Ralf Strauss
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Josh Henley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.76
Chris Wendt
published 3
2.46
John Lombard
published
2.39
Ian Elliott
published 2.5
2.26
Eddie Ewing
published 2.5
2.14
Kenny Hastings
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Henley + Ralf Strauss7354% gamesnot enough data
Ralf Strauss + Kenny Hastings3256% gamesnot enough data
Josh Henley + Kenny Hastings314 matchesnot enough data
Eddie Ewing + John Lombard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ralf Strauss
43W–31L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Josh Henley
44W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Chris Wendt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
John Lombard
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
2.5
Ian Elliott
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Eddie Ewing
1W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Kenny Hastings
22W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.