Teams

WIG:Wightman:Pinto

2025 EMA Adult 65 & Over Men · 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-08vs IPCC:Ipswich CC:LicariLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoger Racine / Richard Stoppe vs Leonard Licari / David Callahan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMike McGonagle / Ralph Pinto vs Anthony DePace / Robert Treitel4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Hardy / Andrzej Niemierko vs Richard Leaf / Hal Whitehouse4-6, 1-6
2025-09-04vs IPCC:Ipswich CC:LicariLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Stoppe / Roger Racine vs David Callahan / Leonard Licari6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRalph Pinto / Mike McGonagle vs Robert Treitel / Anthony DePace4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Hardy / Andrzej Niemierko vs Richard Leaf / Hal Whitehouse2-6, 3-6
2025-09-01vs IPCC:Ipswich CC:LicariLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Racine / Richard Stoppe vs Leonard Licari / Thomas Debyle6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrzej Niemierko / Ralph Pinto vs Hal Whitehouse / Robert Bondaruk6-7, 0-6
2025-08-31vs IPCC:Ipswich CC:LicariLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrzej Niemierko / Ralph Pinto vs Thomas Debyle / Leonard Licari2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Racine / Richard Stoppe vs Robert Bondaruk / Hal Whitehouse6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IPCC:Ipswich CC:Licari041027103
2WIG:Wightman:Pinto0401224146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Bruce Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Ralph Pinto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Andrzej Niemierko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bruce Patton
published
Mike McGonagle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Stoppe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roger Racine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike McGonagle + Roger Racine134 matchesnot enough data
Mike McGonagle + Ralph Pinto044 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stoppe + Roger Racine044 matchesnot enough data
Andrzej Niemierko + Ralph Pinto134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Hardy
20W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Ralph Pinto
26W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Andrzej Niemierko
53W–84L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Bruce Patton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike McGonagle
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Stoppe
12W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roger Racine
2W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.