Teams

KM/P&R/6.5Combo

OBX COMBO 18 &over · 6.5 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 6:00 PM
vs
Family Recreation Park
Sep 17 6:00 PM
vs
Family Recreation Park
Sep 24 6:00 PM
vs
Family Recreation Park
Oct 1 6:00 PM
vs
Family Recreation Park
Oct 8 6:00 PM
vs
Family Recreation Park
Oct 15 6:00 PM
vs
Family Recreation Park
2026-08-27vs Kent Stop, Won't Stop Combo 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Farmer / Tianna Stathis vs Emma Turnbull / Molly Pirrung2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Evanoff / Kristen Iwashchenko vs Stephanie Wills / Michelle Donahue6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoyce Smith / Hillary Nystrom vs Nurefsan Journigan / Veronica Kent1-6, 3-6
2026-08-20vs Kent Stop, Won't Stop Combo 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMandy Earnest / Jennifer Lunceford vs Brie Floyd / Ksusha Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE vs Andrea Watkins / Amanda Binder2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJ Kate Matzgannis / Sarah Wongmanee vs Jessica Gorr / Porsche Polise-Zygler1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kent Stop, Won't Stop Combo 18+1030010
2KM/P&R/6.5Combo0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Margaret Stovall
published
3.02
Jennifer Lunceford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Summer Copeland
published
2.90
Catherine Evanoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Tianna Stathis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mandy Earnest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Joyce Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
ELIZABETH Ryan
published
2.69
Heidi Velazquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
J Kate Matzgannis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Kristen Iwashchenko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Hillary Nystrom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Sarah Wongmanee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Evanoff + Hillary Nystrom3262% games+26.3% vs expected
KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE + Heidi Velazquez1536% games+6.3% vs expected
Joyce Smith + Hillary Nystrom3446% games−1.8% vs expected
Mandy Earnest + Summer Copeland3245% games−7.7% vs expected
Kristen Iwashchenko + Joyce Smith1643% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Lunceford + Mandy Earnest044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lunceford + Summer Copeland134 matchesnot enough data
KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE + Hillary Nystrom044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Stovall
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jennifer Lunceford
15W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Summer Copeland
19W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Catherine Evanoff
24W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Tianna Stathis
36W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
Mandy Earnest
14W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Joyce Smith
24W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
ELIZABETH Ryan
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Heidi Velazquez
6W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
J Kate Matzgannis
9W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Kristen Iwashchenko
12W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Hillary Nystrom
25W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE
6W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
Sarah Wongmanee
24W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.