Teams

HCC - Hill

2023 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-21vs WS - McLaughlinSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLinda Vaughn / Jennifer Halinski vs Alicia Pfahler / Anchalee Phataralaoha6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Meghann Able6-2, 6-2
2023-07-20vs DB - BromirskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Halinski / Cindy Richardson vs Tiffany Thomas / Rhoda Wilburn0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Cox / Betsy Severance vs Mara Rodriguez / Andrea Love2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Tania Alavi1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Jaclyn Hovde5-7
2023-07-08vs DB - GilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Halinski / Sandra Werbel vs Francine Turney / Melinda Hart1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVinata Vedam-Mai / Betsy Severance vs Susie Finfrock / Anita Frankenberger4-6, 2-6
2023-07-05vs Florida/Spink/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Maria Curatolo3-6, 1-6
2023-06-11vs WS - McLaughlinWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelsy Hill / Margot Maurer vs Laurie McLaughlin / Lindy Archambeau7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs DB - GilsonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Tahereh Toghiyani3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Severance / Cindy Richardson vs Mickie Anderson / Kjerstin Terry6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-17Split 11
W#1 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Linda Garcia-Crespo6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Vaughn / Betsy Severance vs Davette Wycoff / Cindy McManus4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Terri Lowery
published
3.22
Kelsy Hill
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.21
Vinata Vedam-Mai
published
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennifer Halinski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Jodi Cox
published
2.78
Betsy Severance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Linda Vaughn
published
2.70
Wanda Cross
published
Jane Catalanotto
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terri Lowery
24W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Kelsy Hill
103W–116L career · 11 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
Vinata Vedam-Mai
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Jennifer Halinski
61W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jodi Cox
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Betsy Severance
13W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.78
Linda Vaughn
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Wanda Cross
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70
Jane Catalanotto
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.