Teams

Team 2 Wolves

2024 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Zurich / Jay Colella vs Jin Kim / Justin Yu6-2, 6-1
2024-06-11vs MidAtlantic/Tiong/Adult18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesYANG LIU / Zachary Zurich vs Keith Bown / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta1-6, 1-6
2024-06-02vs Team 8 RacqueteersWon 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Zurich / Jay Colella vs Adnan Karimi / John Burns6-4, 6-0
2024-05-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesZachary Zurich / Jay Colella vs PJ Barbour / Andrew Sridhar6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlan Zhang / Zachary Zurich vs Matthew Day / Alexander Sears6-3, 6-2
2024-04-07vs Team 6 Central TennisWon 10
W#3 DoublesJay Colella / Zachary Zurich vs David Chu / Edwin Yoon6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Xin Geng
published
3.49
XIAOCHUN JI
published
3.39
Jianli Pan
published
3.35
Zachary Zurich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Frank Wang
published 3.5
3.28
YANG LIU
published
Chung-Kai Hsiao
published 3.5
3.23
Alan Zhang
published 3.5
3.13
David Tong
published 3.5
3.13
Jay Colella
published
2.91
Kai Yu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xin Geng + Jianli Pan8455% games+4.1% vs expected
Frank Wang + XIAOCHUN JI6259% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xin Geng
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
XIAOCHUN JI
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Jianli Pan
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Zachary Zurich
29W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Frank Wang
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
YANG LIU
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Chung-Kai Hsiao
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Alan Zhang
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
David Tong
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
Jay Colella
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kai Yu
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.