Teams

4-JByrd-Eno

2023 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Mixed 9.0 Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs 3-KMedynskaya-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesStacey Burkert / William Sendor vs Aaron Hiller / Lisa Spees1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Mollie Williams vs Justin Fowler / Karen Griffin4-6, 4-6
2023-07-12vs 2-KLahey-Eno-18 9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLoic Didavi / Hannah Silverstein vs Alex Renfrow / Paula Collado Cordon6-1, 6-2
2023-07-03vs 1-CVinson-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Bauman / Jermaine Byrd vs Julien de la Mettrie / Emily Tinervin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Perdue / Neeta Vora vs Ashley Rogers / Shaun Ward6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-28vs 3-KMedynskaya-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohann Rapp / Stacey Burkert vs Jake Wolfe / Lisa Spees6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-25vs 2-KLahey-Eno-18 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohann Rapp / Stacey Burkert vs Justin Gagnon / Elizabeth Heald2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-31vs 1-CVinson-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Sendor / Neeta Vora vs Emily Tinervin / Julien de la Mettrie1-6, 1-6
2023-05-24vs 2-KLahey-Eno-18 9.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Duncan / Hannah Silverstein vs Zoe Dubrow / James Shea4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Mixed 9.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Loic Didavi
published
4.42
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.30
Neeta Vora
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Mollie Williams
published
4.27
William Sendor
published
4.11
Leigh Mullins
published
4.07
Donna Bauman
published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Stacey Burkert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Johann Rapp
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Loic Didavi
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.66
4.5
Andrew Perdue
38W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Neeta Vora
116W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.30
Mollie Williams
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.28
William Sendor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
Leigh Mullins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Donna Bauman
24W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Stacey Burkert
175W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Johann Rapp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.