Teams

Team 3 Topspin Lobsters

2026 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.58 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-04vs Team 2 Grace's Aces 18+ 9.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesAravind Krishna / Sunmin Kim vs Karis S Kim / Jonathan Santos6-3, 6-6
L#2 DoublesYe Hu / Phat Bui vs Margarita Baldwin / Landon Schaefer6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Team 1 Triple ThreatWon 30
W#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Sunmin Kim vs Emma Shine / Bob White6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAravind Krishna / Kasey Kinney vs Jagannath Chakravarty / Isabelle Wessel6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeremy Mancus / Stephanie Pitts vs Nathan Leslie / Christine Becer6-4, 6-1
2026-03-28vs Team 5 Racquet LabSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJan Neumann / Heather Carr vs Neal Devkaran / Sohee Chu6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Pitts / Aravind Krishna vs Daniel Bernal / Lisa Puzzuoli3-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs Team 5 Racquet LabWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeremy Mancus / Sunmin Kim vs Krishna Polisetty / Anne Polino7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesZachary Jones / Trinh Banks vs Neal Devkaran / Sohee Chu6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-07vs Team 4 String TheoryLost 12
L#1 DoublesAravind Krishna / Kasey Kinney vs Michael Morris / Kanika Sabor6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesZachary Jones / Trinh Banks vs Barghav Hariharan / Kristina Heino7-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesPhat Bui / Ye Hu vs Anthony Nguyen / Kelley Cantrell3-6, 6-5
2026-02-28vs Team 2 Grace's Aces 18+ 9.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSunmin Kim / Austin Longacre vs Manu Balasubramanian / Margarita Baldwin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeremy Mancus / Stephanie Pitts vs RICARDO DURAN / Nevena Arsic1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYe Hu / Phat Bui vs Karis S Kim / Jonathan Santos6-7, 4-4
2026-01-23vs Team 1 Triple ThreatLost 12
W#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Sunmin Kim vs John Pennington / Isabelle Wessel6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAravind Krishna / Stephanie Pitts vs Kelsey Semrod / Thomas Cyrnak0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChangfu Xiao / Ye Hu vs Emma Shine / Bob White4-6, 6-5
2026-01-11vs Team 4 String TheoryWon 21
W#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Sunmin Kim vs Matt Morgan / Kristina Heino6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy Mancus / Stephanie Pitts vs Danielle Abraham / Mike Burgoyne5-7, 5-3
L#3 DoublesJan Neumann / Heather Carr vs Annie Richardson / Barghav Hariharan5-7, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 2 Grace's Aces 18+ 9.08018614160
2Team 4 String Theory44131123195
3Team 3 Topspin Lobsters44131123214
4Team 1 Triple Threat3591532236
5Team 5 Racquet Lab1771734248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Austin Longacre
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 5
4.63
Jeremy Mancus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.44
Changfu Xiao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Heather Carr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Aravind Krishna
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.30
Zachary Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Ye Hu
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.25
Phat Bui
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.23
Jan Neumann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Kasey Kinney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.10
Stephanie Pitts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.01
Trinh Banks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Sunmin Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Neumann + Heather Carr6750% games−1.4% vs expected
Ye Hu + Phat Bui033 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Jones + Trinh Banks303 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Mancus + Stephanie Pitts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Longacre
64W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.92
Jeremy Mancus
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.63
4.5
Changfu Xiao
109W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.44
4.5
Heather Carr
40W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · 8 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
4.36
Zachary Jones
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Ye Hu
31W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
Phat Bui
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Jan Neumann
89W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Kasey Kinney
113W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
4.14
Stephanie Pitts
58W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
4.10
Trinh Banks
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Sunmin Kim
79W–66L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.