Teams

Lifetime White

2026 OH OV FALL A18&O Cincinnati · 2026 OH OV Fall 18&O 5.0 W Cincinnati

5 players · average NTRP 4.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-03vs Lifetime RedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatie Kase / Kristen Baldini vs Angela Wilson / Kelly Allen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShae Kimbell vs Moreen Nienaber6-4, 6-4
2025-11-04vs Lifetime RedWon 21
W#1 DoublesCigdem Duru / Beth Kushon vs Nicole Ehme / Kelly Allen7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKristen Baldini vs Angela Wilson5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Kase / Shae Kimbell vs Sarika Reddy Sunki / Moreen Nienaber7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-11-03vs Lifetime RedWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatie Kase vs Moreen Nienaber6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Baldini / Beth Kushon vs Sarika Reddy Sunki / Kelly Allen6-3, 6-3
2025-10-28vs Lifetime RedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCigdem Duru / Shae Kimbell vs Nicole Ehme / Moreen Nienaber6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKatie Kase / Beth Kushon vs Sarika Reddy Sunki / Kelly Allen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-18vs Lifetime RedWon 30
W#1 DoublesCigdem Duru / Shae Kimbell vs Sarika Reddy Sunki / Moreen Nienaber6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBeth Kushon vs Kelly Allen6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Kase / Kristen Baldini vs Nicole Ehme / Angela Wilson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 OH OV Fall 18&O 5.0 W Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime White419615138
2Lifetime Red1441124154

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Shae Kimbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.32
Kristen Baldini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.27
Katie Kase
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.21
Cigdem Duru
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.87
Beth Kushon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Kushon + Katie Kase5260% games+4.5% vs expected
Beth Kushon + Kristen Baldini213 matchesnot enough data
Shae Kimbell + Cigdem Duru213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shae Kimbell
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
Kristen Baldini
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
Katie Kase
41W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
5
Cigdem Duru
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
4.21
4.5
Beth Kushon
79W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.