Teams

Brevard/Barto/55&Over6.0W

2025 Brevard Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracey Drake / Julia Tulloch vs Adrienne Schier / Sue Blevins6-1, 6-3
2025-02-28vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Harris / Linda Strickland vs Mona Peterson / Debra Zeitz6-1, 6-2
2025-02-21vs Fee - LuerWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey Drake / Linda Strickland vs Katharyn Luer / Brenda Tarquinio6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Anne Barto vs Adrienne Schier / Sue Blevins6-1, 6-2
2025-02-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Harris / Linda Strickland vs Adrienne Schier / Sue Blevins4-6, 3-6
2025-02-07vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Linda Strickland vs Mona Peterson / Katharyn Luer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-31Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Julia Tulloch vs Vicki Slate / Debra Zeitz6-0, 6-1
2025-01-17vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Anne Barto vs Vicki Slate / Brenda Tarquinio6-4, 6-0
2025-01-10vs Fee - LuerLost 01
L#2 DoublesBerna Gunnerson / Linda Strickland vs Patricia de Simone / Renee Jiannine6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Tracey Drake
published
2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Megan Holthaus
published
Anne Barto
published 3
Brenda Harris
published 3
Darlissa Salazar
published 3
Debbie Maropis
published 3
2.73
Susan Wilkes
published
2.67
Linda Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Strickland + Tracey Drake044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracey Drake
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Megan Holthaus
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Anne Barto
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brenda Harris
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Darlissa Salazar
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Maropis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Wilkes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Linda Strickland
12W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.