Teams

MPTC - Slice Girls

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · Open HTA Ladies Singles

7 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-25vs LLTC - The TemptationsLost 04
L#1 SinglesJoyce Tiong vs Brittany Jalomo6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesErika Gruber vs Cindy Tiu3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesAna Cortes vs Heather Mee1-6, 3-6
L#4 SinglesLina Gonzalezoviedo vs Jessica Emerald0-6, 0-6
2026-02-18vs ROCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMaria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Michelle Campbell6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAbby Dennett vs Sara Wilks6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesErika Gruber vs Asan Atilla7-5, 7-5
2026-02-04vs LLTC - The TemptationsWon 31
W#1 SinglesAgnese Rozite vs Cindy Tiu6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAbby Dennett vs Chelsea Grear6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMaria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Mary Volf6-0, 6-1
L#4 SinglesAna Cortes vs Erica Delaney4-6, 6-7
2026-01-28vs ROCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAbby Dennett vs Michelle Campbell7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMaria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Sidney Stewart6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open HTA Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Agnese Rozite
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.56
Abby Dennett
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.34
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.25
Joyce Tiong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.14
Erika Gruber
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.61
Ana Cortes
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Lina Gonzalezoviedo
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Dennett + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4253% games+3.3% vs expected
Joyce Tiong + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4150% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Agnese Rozite
7W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
4.83
5
Abby Dennett
40W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.56
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
44W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
Joyce Tiong
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Erika Gruber
48W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
4.14
3.5
Ana Cortes
18W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61
Lina Gonzalezoviedo
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.