Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Lake Country WAC Shafer

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Molsky / Claire Woelfle vs Meg Roman / Michele Dearing1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLindsay Harman vs Caina Weiner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Thren / Deborah Pape vs Mercedes Paz / Carrie Fleming3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Schultz / Linda Balthazor vs Stephanie Hillmann / Maricela Feker2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSusan Schultz / Michelle Thren vs Jennifer Mcdonald / Robyn Wilgreen4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLindsay Harman vs Kristin Bremenkamp6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Balthazor / Deborah Pape vs Camilla Adelman / Katie Corcoran0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAliza Shafer / Madelyn Mickiewicz vs Betsy Jost / Melissa Bashaw3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLindsay Harman / Susan Schultz vs Chris DAmico / Melissa Hoeft5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Thren / Claire Woelfle vs Elisabeth Partyka / Doreen Potter1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAliza Shafer / Madelyn Mickiewicz vs Olga Eydelman / Monica Lineberger6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJulie Molsky / Susan Schultz vs Mary Ellen Levra / Lisa Reedy2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLindsay Harman vs Brenda Heinecke6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKeren Rosner / Linda Balthazor vs Katrina Hoffmann / Stacy Gass2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesClaire Woelfle vs Lauren Morrow1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAliza Shafer / Madelyn Mickiewicz vs Joyce Casey / Tiffany Zignego1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAllison Bardole / Deborah Pape vs Jane Mlenar / Erin Dummert5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Thren / Claire Woelfle vs Shelley Burns / Jennifer Williams3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMadelyn Mickiewicz / Aliza Shafer vs Karen Moran / Arlene Adams6-4, 6-0
L#1 DoublesDeborah Pape / Allison Bardole vs Tina Maloney / MICHELLE MESSLING1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Schultz / Michelle Thren vs Amy Germershausen / Deanna Weddig2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMadelyn Mickiewicz vs Alissa Braatz0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAliza Shafer / Linda Balthazor vs Olga Kaslow / Bernadette Trucco6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Lindsay Harman
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Allison Bardole
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Michelle Thren
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Deborah Pape
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.45
Linda Balthazor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Madelyn Mickiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.32
Susan Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.31
Aliza Shafer
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
2.23
Claire Woelfle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Bardole + Deborah Pape6745% games+1.8% vs expected
Madelyn Mickiewicz + Aliza Shafer3243% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Harman
45W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Allison Bardole
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Michelle Thren
11W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Deborah Pape
16W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Linda Balthazor
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Madelyn Mickiewicz
17W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Susan Schultz
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
2.5
Aliza Shafer
5W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Claire Woelfle
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.