Teams

Shaw, Lisa

2025 Team Singles-JXN · Women 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-21vs Taylor, AlyssaWon 21
L#1 SinglesKym Gore vs Alyssa Taylor2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSue Werre vs Emily Mangum6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKelli Ford vs Kristi Thompson6-0, 6-0
2025-12-07vs Bayati, MitraLost 03
L#1 SinglesDeborah Hairston vs Olivia Barnard1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSue Werre vs Cece Sherrod4-6, 3-3
L#3 SinglesEmilie Lynn vs Kendra Redding3-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs Taylor, AlyssaWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelli Ford vs Alyssa Taylor6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDeborah Hairston vs Emily Mangum3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKym Gore vs Mary Lauren Boykin6-1, 6-4
2025-11-23vs Johnson, MackenzieLost 12
L#1 SinglesEmilie Lynn vs Monique Holmes1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDeborah Hairston vs Kayla Soukup4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSue Werre vs Avery Nash6-4, 6-2
2025-11-16vs Bayati, MitraLost 03
L#1 SinglesSue Werre vs Kari Thomas2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelli Ford vs Alexandria Sylvester0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesDeborah Hairston vs Stephanie Bailey1-6, 0-6
2025-11-02vs Taylor, AlyssaLost 12
W#1 SinglesKelli Ford vs Emily Mangum6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDeborah Hairston vs Mary Lauren Boykin2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesEmilie Lynn vs Rose Edmonston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-26vs Johnson, MackenzieLost 12
L#1 SinglesRicka Hill vs Melissa Kaye Mccombs0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKym Gore vs Mackenzie Johnson6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesEmilie Lynn vs Avery Nash2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor, Alyssa43111022153
2Johnson, Mackenzie2451326179
3Shaw, Lisa2571429201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Kelli Ford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.39
Kym Gore
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Deborah Hairston
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.07
Emilie Lynn
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Ricka Hill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sue Werre
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Ford
33W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Kym Gore
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Deborah Hairston
0W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Emilie Lynn
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Ricka Hill
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sue Werre
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.