Teams

Encantada - Cristina Figueroa

Adult 18 &Over 2026 · 2026 18 & Over Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PUERTO RICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-28vs GTC Kiss My Ace - Pedro OrtizLost 12
W#1 DoublesFabiana Pineda / Aimee Ortiz vs Betsy Orta / Leira Santiago Castillo6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGlisselle Mateo vs Kathy De Jesus Bernard2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdriana Pineda / Mariana Betancourt vs Zuleika Lebron / Frances Burgos4-6, 1-6
2026-06-27vs GTC Kiss My Ace - Pedro OrtizLost 03
L#1 DoublesMariana Betancourt / Fabiana Pineda vs Zuleika Lebron / Leira Santiago Castillo5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Kathy De Jesus Bernard1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCristina Figueroa / Glisselle Mateo vs Soraida Gonzalez / Xiomara Rivera1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAdriana Pineda / Carla Roche vs Cristina Naveira Navarro / Maria Burgos0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Sallymar Delgado Reyes7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCristina Figueroa / Glisselle Mateo vs Dafne Liz Colon Olmeda / Mariely Garcia Veguilla1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMariana Betancourt / Adriana Pineda vs Paola Quevedo Santos / Vanelyss Matos6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Lydia Gonzalez6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCristina Figueroa / Fabiola Peniza vs Sheika Gomez / Gabriela Sosa Torres0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMariana Betancourt / Carla Roche vs Dafne Liz Colon Olmeda / Marta Lopez4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Emely de Jesus6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCristina Figueroa / Glisselle Mateo vs Cristina Naveira Navarro / Mariely Garcia Veguilla5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-07vs GTC Kiss My Ace - Pedro OrtizLost 12
L#1 DoublesFabiola Peniza / Cristina Figueroa vs Frances Burgos / Elisa Varela Figueroa1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGlisselle Mateo vs Kathy De Jesus Bernard0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMariana Betancourt / Fabiana Pineda vs Soraida Gonzalez / Xiomara Rivera7-6, 6-0
L#1 DoublesFabiola Peniza / Cristina Figueroa vs Lara Anderson / Vanelyss Matos2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Gabriela Sosa Torres6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCarla Roche / Mariana Betancourt vs Sheika Gomez / Yahemi Collazo6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesMariana Betancourt / Fabiana Pineda vs Sheika Gomez / Gabriela Sosa Torres7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Paola Quevedo Santos6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCristina Figueroa / Glisselle Mateo vs Aurimar Rodriguez Morales / Kathiria Negron6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesFabiana Pineda / Adriana Pineda vs Mariely Garcia Veguilla / Dafne Liz Colon Olmeda3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAimee Ortiz vs Maria Burgos1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCristina Figueroa / Fabiola Peniza vs Emely de Jesus / Sallymar Delgado Reyes6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.39
Fabiana Pineda
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.36
Aimee Ortiz
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 2.5
2.27
Carla Roche
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Mariana Betancourt
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.20
Fabiola Peniza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Adriana Pineda
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Glisselle Mateo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.95
Cristina Figueroa
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glisselle Mateo + Cristina Figueroa1439% games−3.6% vs expected
Cristina Figueroa + Fabiola Peniza134 matchesnot enough data
Fabiana Pineda + Adriana Pineda224 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Ortiz + Adriana Pineda123 matchesnot enough data
Cristina Figueroa + Adriana Pineda033 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Quinones Acevedo + Fabiana Pineda123 matchesnot enough data
Mariana Betancourt + Fabiana Pineda123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fabiana Pineda
29W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Aimee Ortiz
13W–29L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Carla Roche
13W–34L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Brenda Quinones Acevedo
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariana Betancourt
5W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Fabiola Peniza
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Adriana Pineda
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Glisselle Mateo
3W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Cristina Figueroa
4W–28L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.