Teams

CKruse.18C-DFC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-21vs THoltz-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Altieri / Kim Rice vs Lily Huang / Lindsay Roofe Lavin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Gold / Christine Kruse vs Kate Upton / Romina Khandani4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Theiling / Martha Martinez vs Tricia Holtz / Lisa Burch4-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs CWilliams-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeredith Altieri / Kim Rice vs Traci Adams / Jenny Latimer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Kruse / Kim Gold vs Clare Mock / Elisa Klein6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJonda Young / Martha Martinez vs Caroline Williams / Amber Byrd3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-07vs JCollins.5.0C-SVCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJonda Young / Martha Martinez vs Azariah Bell / Janna Hess3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Altieri / Kim Rice vs Lori Small / Katherine Roberts6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CKruse.18C-DFC2042533
2JCollins.5.0C-SVC1133658
3CWilliams-UNC02151167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Dora Gosselin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Megan Theiling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Lilie Bonzani
published
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Meredith Altieri
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Christine Kruse
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.19
Kim Gold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Kruse + Kim Gold3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dora Gosselin
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.36
Megan Theiling
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Lilie Bonzani
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.36
Meredith Altieri
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Christine Kruse
16W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Kim Gold
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.