Teams

LATA18/Vogel/LCTC

2023 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 8.0 Adult Mixed Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-05vs LATA18/Wescott/LCTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesChrissy Raynor / Brandon Doty vs Katie Meyers / Joshua Estes4-6, 3-6
2023-05-08vs LATA18/Cherry/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandon Doty / Mary Ellen Potter vs Ryan Auger / Brett Stevens7-6, 6-2
2023-05-01vs LATA18/Wescott/LCTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesChrissy Raynor / Brandon Doty vs Andrew Jackson / Amanda Willoughby4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Laura Plyler
published
3.95
Kevin Felkel
published
3.85
Carey Wood
published 4
3.85
Brandon Doty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
Megan Freiburger
published
3.79
Ben Stitely
published 4
3.79
Ben Freiburger
published 4
3.79
Jenkins Mann
published
3.74
Loren Ryan
published
3.67
Chrissy Raynor
published 4
3.65
Amanda Turpin
published 4
3.52
Nathan Sanders
published
3.48
Randi Vogel
published
3.42
Colin Raynor
published 3.5
3.38
Roger Sears
published
3.23
Angie McCoy
published 3.5
Brian Lim
published
Mary Ellen Potter
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Plyler
50W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.41
Kevin Felkel
79W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Carey Wood
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Brandon Doty
132W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Megan Freiburger
19W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Ben Stitely
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Ben Freiburger
30W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Jenkins Mann
65W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Loren Ryan
105W–31L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Chrissy Raynor
38W–21L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Amanda Turpin
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.65
Nathan Sanders
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
Randi Vogel
47W–21L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Colin Raynor
38W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.42
Roger Sears
52W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Angie McCoy
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Brian Lim
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Ellen Potter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.