Teams

SS-G GREY

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-17vs HFII REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Concialdi / Damon Piccone vs Jon Jacobson / Bradley Cole6-3, 6-1
2023-07-10vs EM REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs Andy Wurst6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric Goldberg / Kevin Concialdi vs Kevin Pilkington / Tyler Chafee6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-26vs HG GREENWon 10
W#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs Ted McCausland6-3, 6-3
2023-06-15vs HV GREENWon 10
W#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs Thomas Calgaard6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Maarten Warnaars
published
3.18
Jason Carr
published
3.17
Kevin Concialdi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Eric Goldberg
published
3.10
Chuck Nelson
published 3.5
3.10
Tim Gilla
published
2.94
Scott Holladay
published
2.91
Mitchell Kaplan
published
2.74
Damon Piccone
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Carr + Eric Goldberg2449% games−16.0% vs expected
Tim Gilla + Chuck Nelson314 matchesnot enough data
Chuck Nelson + Eric Goldberg314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Carr + Mitchell Kaplan224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Holladay + Mitchell Kaplan134 matchesnot enough data
Tim Gilla + Scott Holladay123 matchesnot enough data
Jason Carr + Scott Holladay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maarten Warnaars
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Jason Carr
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kevin Concialdi
65W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Eric Goldberg
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Chuck Nelson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Tim Gilla
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Scott Holladay
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Mitchell Kaplan
28W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Damon Piccone
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.