Teams

Bradley - Oakwood 7.5

2024 Lynchburg Combo · Lynchburg Combo 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-28vs Thomas - BCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Hughes / Fran Inge vs Mary Stuart Battle / Cheryl Betz1-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Will / Kelly Knight vs Allison Ebert / Lory Sibcy6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawn Fraser / Elizabeth Kettinger vs Jenn Dean / Emily Wolanski6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-24vs Thomas - BCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Hughes / Elizabeth Bogle vs Mary Stuart Battle / Stacey Basten6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEliana Marcilio / Fran Inge vs Stephanie Thomas / Jennipher Lucado6-2, 6-0
2024-10-03vs Thomas - BCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Fraser / Susan Larson vs Jenn Dean / Stephanie Thomas6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEliana Marcilio / Fran Inge vs Allison Ebert / Stacey Basten6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Dawn Fraser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Grace Petty
published
3.80
Kelly Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Eliana Marcilio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Maria Roberts
published
3.60
Fran Inge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Shae Connell
published
3.58
Elizabeth Bogle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Lynn Will
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Elizabeth Kettinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jessica Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Susan Larson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Boylan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Roberts + Dawn Fraser3252% gamesnot enough data
Shae Connell + Elizabeth Bogle303 matchesnot enough data
Eliana Marcilio + Dawn Fraser303 matchesnot enough data
Grace Petty + Dawn Fraser303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Fraser
115W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Grace Petty
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Kelly Knight
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Eliana Marcilio
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
Maria Roberts
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Fran Inge
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Shae Connell
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
Elizabeth Bogle
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lynn Will
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Elizabeth Kettinger
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jessica Hughes
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Susan Larson
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Teresa Boylan
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.