Teams

*3-PMathena-HR

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-06vs *1-EReiter-HRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Fortin / Katie Neal vs Julie Spearman / Joanne McCallie6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinda Neal / West Dupuis vs Brynn Hale / Cynthia Sundy3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-29vs *2-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Riefkohl / Mary Fortin vs Diane Birkemo / Kimber Barnett3-6, 4-6
2024-04-08vs *2-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Herring / West Dupuis vs Adrianne Leinbach / Patty Dischinger2-6, 2-6
2024-03-25vs *1-EReiter-HRSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNancy Riefkohl / Mary Fortin vs Jennifer Gillie / Carrie Norry6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWest Dupuis / Karen Sindelar vs Brynn Hale / Joanne McCallie0-6, 2-6
2024-03-18vs *2-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeona Buckley / Mary Fortin vs Adrianne Leinbach / Patty Dischinger2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Katie Neal
published
3.38
Sheana Funkhouser
published
3.34
Leona Buckley
published
3.30
Karin Yoch
published
3.18
Jaime Parker
published
3.10
Mary Fortin
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Sindelar
published
2.94
Linda Neal
published
2.80
West Dupuis
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Sandra Herring
published
Nancy Riefkohl
published
Patty Mathena
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Fortin + Sheana Funkhouser134 matchesnot enough data
Sheana Funkhouser + Leona Buckley224 matchesnot enough data
Sheana Funkhouser + Karin Yoch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Neal
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
Sheana Funkhouser
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Leona Buckley
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Karin Yoch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Jaime Parker
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Mary Fortin
113W–105L career · 10 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Sindelar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Linda Neal
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
West Dupuis
16W–45L career · 9 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.80
Sandra Herring
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Nancy Riefkohl
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patty Mathena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.