Teams

Tri-Level Men

2025 TRI-Level · Men's- 4.5,4.0,3.5

8 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-19vs Tri-MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulian Mirano / Sam Ritchie vs Andrew Kilpatrick / Ryan Hendrickson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJames Buckwalter / Jorge Barron vs Michael Beckett / Anthony Gray6-4, 6-3
2025-10-19vs SAZ Tri Level M- Darrel TomasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesNeil Kaura / Matthew Rohne vs David Hallinan / Kyle Seyler1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRich Cruz / Myls Miller vs Henry Foster / Hoa Luu4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Buckwalter / Jorge Barron vs Karl Sprague / Scott Haseman2-6, 4-6
2025-10-18vs SAZ Tri Level M- Darrel TomasaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSam Ritchie / Julian Mirano vs Greg Desilva / David Hallinan2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRich Cruz / Myls Miller vs Henry Foster / Hoa Luu0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Buckwalter / Jorge Barron vs Karl Sprague / Scott Haseman2-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs Tri-MenWon 21
W#1 DoublesNeil Kaura / Matthew Rohne vs Andrew Kilpatrick / Ryan Hendrickson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRich Cruz / Myls Miller vs Daniyar Murataliev / David Gonzalez6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJorge Barron / James Buckwalter vs Ryan Kopp / Anthony Gray3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men's- 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAZ Tri Level M- Darrel Tomasa40111255
2Tri-Level Men226613101
3Tri-Men0411123142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Sam Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Neil Kaura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Julian Mirano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Myls Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Matthew Rohne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Rich Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jorge Barron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
James Buckwalter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Buckwalter + Jorge Barron1441% games−5.1% vs expected
Myls Miller + Rich Cruz4743% games−5.7% vs expected
Neil Kaura + Matthew Rohne314 matchesnot enough data
Julian Mirano + Sam Ritchie314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sam Ritchie
50W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
Neil Kaura
54W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Julian Mirano
63W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Myls Miller
49W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Matthew Rohne
112W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Rich Cruz
7W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jorge Barron
99W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
James Buckwalter
82W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.