Teams

Berreth 55+ 7.5WN

2022 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-03vs Chance/Dollar 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Robyn Manning vs Beverly Burke / Suzanne Johnson6-4
2022-09-26vs Beshears/Susong 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Robyn Manning vs Janis Beshears / Mary Ann Nixon6-3, 6-3
2022-09-19vs Majestic 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarsha Tice / Sallye Parker vs Bee Baker / Lisa Baker2-6, 2-6
2022-09-12vs Chance/Dollar 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarsha Tice / Sallye Parker vs Judy Eaton / Marie-Lyne Lavoie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-23vs Majestic 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarsha Tice / Sallye Parker vs Lisa Baker / Lynne Murray1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-08vs Beshears/Susong 55+ 7.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSallye Parker / Marsha Tice vs Mary Fowler / Susan Payne6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathy Pace / Robyn Manning vs Debbie Shiflet / Anne Thornton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.70
Ann Evans
published 4
3.69
Pam McAmis
published
3.60
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.48
Mary Batts
published
3.37
Marsha Tice
published
3.35
Tammie Hughes
published
3.32
Kathy Brown
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.27
Gladys Dunn
published 3.5
3.21
Robyn Manning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukari Matsuoka + Carolyn Pellerin5063% games+1.8% vs expected
Mary Batts + Yukari Matsuoka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yukari Matsuoka
32W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ann Evans
24W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Pam McAmis
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Mary Batts
30W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Tammie Hughes
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gladys Dunn
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Robyn Manning
139W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.