Teams

Three's Company

2026 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-05vs Serve It UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesHannah Santiago / Zdenka Edgar vs Dawn Stuart / Ingrid Heinze4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Garcia / Margaret Chavez vs Lisa Martinez / Sylvia Garza0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesShannon Wagner / Marissa Kenisky vs Erika Ganey / Nolette Brell1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Racq PacqLost 12
W#1 DoublesHannah Santiago / Melinda Gonzales vs Lisa Hackett / Bonnie Schweinsberg6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHope Baker / Diana Garcia vs Noemi Copeland / Amy Flowers1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLathia Bell / Jennifer Adams vs Sarah Naylor / Jami Painter3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Tri-HarderWon 21
W#1 DoublesNorma Trevino / Zdenka Edgar vs Eileen Vogt / Sunnie Alderete6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHope Baker / Margaret Chavez vs Cassie Villegas / Kelly Horne3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLathia Bell / Jennifer Adams vs Shandria Seybold / Lindsey Musch3-6, 4-6
2025-10-04vs Shavano Lethal LadiesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Nichols / Brenda Volpe vs Sarah Landry / Tina OBryan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Moreno / Maggie Everett vs Dianna Gembler-Roberts / Viviane van Poppel1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFELISE de NOVO / Marissa Kenisky vs Doreen Amft / Irma Trevino6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-03vs TRI AGAINLost 12
L#1 DoublesNorma Trevino / Brenda Volpe vs Sharron Blair / Elizabeth Ojeda1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Garcia / Maggie Everett vs Kathy Burkholder / Natalie Drayton4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLathia Bell / FELISE de NOVO vs Victoria Lutterloh / Stephanie Asfeld6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-03vs TerminettersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSharon Nichols / Melinda Gonzales vs Kristin Ortiz / Kirstin Clark5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Moreno / Margaret Chavez vs Melba Trevino / Rhonda Alexander2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Hannah Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Zdenka Edgar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Melinda Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Sharon Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Norma Trevino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Brenda Volpe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Margaret Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Maggie Everett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Hope Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Stephanie Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Diana Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
FELISE de NOVO
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Marissa Kenisky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Lathia Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Volpe + Norma Trevino4648% games−8.0% vs expected
Diana Garcia + Hope Baker224 matchesnot enough data
Hope Baker + Stephanie Moreno044 matchesnot enough data
Diana Garcia + Lathia Bell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Santiago
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Zdenka Edgar
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Melinda Gonzales
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Sharon Nichols
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Norma Trevino
13W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brenda Volpe
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Margaret Chavez
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Maggie Everett
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Hope Baker
17W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Stephanie Moreno
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Diana Garcia
16W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
FELISE de NOVO
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Marissa Kenisky
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lathia Bell
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.