Teams

WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Heyer Park Stevens

2025 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women (Eve)

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesMary Hansen / Judy Carlson vs Karen Lucey / Joyce Koker2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Johnson / Brenda Bartholomew vs Beth LambrechtScasny / Mary Murphy6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDorothy Murphy / Ann Vogel vs Kathleen Dubiel / Tina Kadrich6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCarol Kossoris / Laura Otto vs Deanna Weiss / Lisa Ellegard6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Hansen / Annette Malloy vs Wei Speagle / Karen Moskow6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Evans / Ann Vogel vs Carol Zembinski / Kathie Chvojicek6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJean Stevens / Brenda Bartholomew vs Wendy Orthober / Lisa Kennedy2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDorothy Murphy / Lisa Pederson vs Natasha Duvall / Patrice Vitucci-Kessenich6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJudy Carlson / Mary Hansen vs Leslie Rosmann / Mariana Alberro3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Pederson / Brenda Bartholomew vs Beth Horneffer / Elizabeth Sendelbach6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Otto / Dorothy Murphy vs Jennifer Starich / Mary Whitfield6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJean Stevens / Annette Malloy vs Donna Rogers / Laurie Pasternak7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJudy Carlson / Mary Hansen vs Anne Sanders / Darlene Beck6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Johnson / Annette Malloy vs Margo Koleski / Elizabeth Feldman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPamela Evans / Ann Vogel vs Catherine Curro / Amelia Hagopian2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLisa Pederson / Dorothy Murphy vs Rae Krivohlavek / Pamela Flores6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Otto / Carol Kossoris vs Christy Janikowski / Myrna Long3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJean Stevens / Brenda Bartholomew vs Charlotte Toboyek / Lynn Landry4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMary Hansen / Judy Carlson vs Jessica Early Byrnes / Toni Flesch6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Vogel / Pamela Evans vs Susan Miller / Beth Raab6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesCarol Kossoris / Laura Otto vs Susan Lutz / Gina Larkin6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Bartholomew / Chris Johnson vs Mary Murphy / Karen Lucey6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Pederson / Dorothy Murphy vs Kathleen Dubiel / Kathy Mueller6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMary Hansen / Judy Carlson vs Deanna Weiss / Lisa Ellegard6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPamela Evans / Ann Vogel vs Carol Zembinski / Kathie Chvojicek6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WI Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women (Eve)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Paley Tennis Cntr Westreich812439152
2WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Heyer Park Stevens7222514195
3WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Lake Country WAC Toboyek7220719193
4WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Princeton Club Lambrecht54141329244
5WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Lake Country WAC Wolf4581941295
6WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML North Shore Elite Fondrie36101738274
7WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Brookfield Elite Sanders1872040273
8WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Brookfield East Pasternak1832450314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Brenda Bartholomew
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.92
Dorothy Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Lisa Pederson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Annette Malloy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Judy Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.71
Carol Kossoris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Ann Vogel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jean Stevens
published
Laura Otto
published
Pamela Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Pederson + Brenda Bartholomew5164% games+6.0% vs expected
Pamela Evans + Ann Vogel11266% games+4.7% vs expected
Dorothy Murphy + Lisa Pederson701662% games+3.5% vs expected
Carol Kossoris + Laura Otto22758% games+2.9% vs expected
Carol Kossoris + Pamela Evans5066% gamesnot enough data
Carol Kossoris + Judy Carlson5070% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Bartholomew + Jean Stevens4159% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Evans + Judy Carlson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Bartholomew
119W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Dorothy Murphy
114W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Lisa Pederson
95W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Annette Malloy
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Carlson
102W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carol Kossoris
103W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ann Vogel
26W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jean Stevens
42W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Otto
50W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Evans
83W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.