Teams

MTC - Alexander

2026 Adult 18 & Over Men Winter - Mobile · 2.5 Men Winter

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-08vs MO - LagmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesDarryl Neese / Edmund Davies vs Mark L Cochran / Brad Coggin6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRodrigo Sankone vs Justin Morris1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJose Gallegos / Max Anderson vs Derek Werthmann / Gabriel Mata3-6, 0-6
2026-03-25vs MO - LagmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesJose Gallegos / Darryl Neese vs Mark L Cochran / Robert Kohrman0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMax Anderson / Trent Taylor vs Ken Curtis / Sebastian Euringer0-6, 2-6
2026-03-18vs MO - LagmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesRodrigo Sankone / Darryl Neese vs Robert Kohrman / Ken Curtis2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDiego Ortiz vs Justin Morris1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEdmund Davies / Trent Taylor vs Sebastian Euringer / Derek Werthmann6-7, 1-6
2026-03-11vs MO - LagmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMax Anderson / Edmund Davies vs Mark L Cochran / Gabriel Mata6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJose Gallegos vs Justin Morris0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDarryl Neese / Joseph Alexander vs Sebastian Euringer / Ken Curtis2-6, 2-6
2026-03-04vs MO - LagmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJose Gallegos / Max Anderson vs Mark L Cochran / Gabriel Mata6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEdmund Davies vs Robert Kohrman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRodrigo Sankone / Diego Ortiz vs Derek Werthmann / Ken Curtis6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Men Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO - Lagman50132777
2MTC - Alexander0521327165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Jose Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.40
Edmund Davies
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.29
Darryl Neese
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.28
Trent Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Joseph Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Max Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.15
Rodrigo Sankone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.06
Diego Ortiz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Max Anderson + Rodrigo Sankone033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Gallegos
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
2.5
Edmund Davies
5W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Darryl Neese
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Trent Taylor
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Joseph Alexander
3W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Max Anderson
1W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Rodrigo Sankone
1W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Diego Ortiz
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.