Teams

CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 18AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Chika Horie
published 4.5
4.39
Wendy Cheng
published
4.21
Yuko Mihara
published
4.20
Sayaka Kishino
published
4.13
Kiyoe Hashimoto
published
4.05
Letha Tran
published
3.93
Jie Kong
published
3.90
June Ong
published
3.90
Junko Ohoka
published
3.81
Catherine Puzon
published 4
3.80
Lori Cruz-Spray
published
3.80
Maggie Yuen
published
3.79
Michelle DeGuzman
published
3.77
Min Qian
published
Hsiao-Yun Yang
published 4
3.71
Sandra Morizawa
published
3.65
Chen Xiao
published 4.5
3.56
Janet Oshiro
published
3.46
Yukie Goda
published
3.32
Masami Matsuura
published
Luciana Guarnieri
published
Mayumi Dojima
published
Natalie Geyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Cruz-Spray + Junko Ohoka033 matchesnot enough data
Lori Cruz-Spray + Maggie Yuen213 matchesnot enough data
Letha Tran + Maggie Yuen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chika Horie
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
4.48
Wendy Cheng
23W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
4.39
Yuko Mihara
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
4.21
Sayaka Kishino
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.20
Kiyoe Hashimoto
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.13
Letha Tran
17W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
Jie Kong
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.93
June Ong
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.90
Junko Ohoka
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Catherine Puzon
23W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Lori Cruz-Spray
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Maggie Yuen
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Michelle DeGuzman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.79
Min Qian
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Hsiao-Yun Yang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Morizawa
23W–29L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4.5
Chen Xiao
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
Janet Oshiro
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.56
Yukie Goda
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Masami Matsuura
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.32
Luciana Guarnieri
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mayumi Dojima
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Geyer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.