Teams

Larson

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-03-25vs KorolkoffWon 10
W#2 DoublesLorali Barber / Laleh Mosavati vs JoAnn Marshall-Hobbs / Joanne Rome6-2, 6-2
2022-03-21vs Love AllWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Klimek / Heather Schreiber vs Kim Rehmann / Cindee Smith6-4, 6-3
2022-03-16vs Manor 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Julie Koplan vs Amy Burgoyne / Kelley Donellan6-7, 6-3
2022-03-15vs RodmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorali Barber / Heather Schreiber vs Shelley Hess / Nina Price2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-09vs PortoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Koplan / Lorali Barber vs Meredith Berlin / Elana Steinberg3-6, 4-6
2022-02-22vs Love HurtsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLorali Barber / Heather Schreiber vs Erin Mascatello / Audrey Zeidan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-16vs KorolkoffLost 01
L#3 DoublesWannapa Siriamnuaypas / Heather Schreiber vs Danielle Woo / Samantha Corrigan2-6, 3-6
2022-02-11vs MagginLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Kimberly Klimek vs Jeanne Pim / JEAN HARVEY5-7, 3-6
2022-02-03vs Manor 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLorali Barber / Kimberly Klimek vs Sherri Dixon / Melisssa Hacopian2-6, 2-6
2022-01-24vs Love AllWon 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Julie Koplan vs Karyn Ferber / Kim Rehmann6-1, 6-1
2022-01-11vs RodmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorali Barber / Laleh Mosavati vs Mayumi Ishihara / Nina Price6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Gina Faricy
published 4
3.73
Ann Kopsidas
published 4
3.72
Heather Schreiber
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.60
Kim Purring
published
3.59
Banu Karimi-Shah
published 4
3.49
Norma Mendelson
published
3.45
Lorali Barber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Charlotte Larson
published 4
Julie Koplan
published
Laleh Mosavati
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorali Barber + Heather Schreiber213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Faricy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Ann Kopsidas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Heather Schreiber
110W–72L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kim Purring
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Banu Karimi-Shah
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Norma Mendelson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Lorali Barber
50W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
4
Charlotte Larson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.30
Julie Koplan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laleh Mosavati
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.