Teams

Shanahan - Girls Just Want to Have Fun

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-12-13vs Burns-Congressional 3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLeanne Bortner / Bettina Lynn vs Lauren Billings / Jennifer Hemann1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Vladeck / Maureen Parkinson vs Rachel Burns / Christy Sporidis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Rowan / Sydney Rowan vs Christa Meyers / Katy Cannon6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Elizabeth Walsh
published 3.5
3.31
Kimberly Hayman
published
3.29
Leanne Bortner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cathy Pasquariello
published 3.5
3.16
Sydney Rowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Regina Bodi
published
3.07
Tiffany Rowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Karen Vladeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Tracy Koretsky
published
3.03
Bettina Lynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.81
Saira Malik
published
2.75
Jennifer Lin-Liu
published
Mary Lynn Shanahan
published
Maureen Parkinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Silvia Dacci
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Rowan + Tiffany Rowan3447% games−2.8% vs expected
Mary Lynn Shanahan + Silvia Dacci213 matchesnot enough data
Regina Bodi + Leanne Bortner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Walsh
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.44
Kimberly Hayman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.31
Leanne Bortner
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Cathy Pasquariello
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sydney Rowan
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Regina Bodi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
Tiffany Rowan
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Karen Vladeck
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Tracy Koretsky
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Bettina Lynn
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Margaret Cornelius
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
Saira Malik
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Jennifer Lin-Liu
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Mary Lynn Shanahan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Parkinson
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Silvia Dacci
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.