Teams

PBCP TURNER

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-02vs FHCS PASSMORESplit 11
W#1 DoublesGlori Cavin / Jane Doe vs Carole Passmore / Julie Moser6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaurie Turner / Lanita Lovelace vs Beth Scutellaro / Miyo Park2-6, 2-6
2022-05-26vs MEMPK KNUTILALost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Ray / Melanie Turner vs Nancy May / Beatriz Arsuaga7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLanita Lovelace / Laurie Turner vs Monica Kohlhofer / Lisa Pennino5-7, 2-6
2022-05-12vs MEMPK DREWESSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGlori Cavin / Deborah Gove vs Carol Chapman-Stanley / Teresa Drewes7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSue Ray / Laurie Turner vs Laura Dimberio / Shawnee Brenner3-6, 2-6
2022-05-05vs CSRC GUINNWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelanie Turner / Glori Cavin vs Denice Yates / Angel Kulich7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSue Ray / Lanita Lovelace vs Lisa Coyle / Marian Phelps6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-28vs CCOC MANNINGLost 02
L#1 SinglesDeborah Gove vs Deb Marshall6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSue Ray / Glori Cavin vs Nerissa England / Sara Connolly-Somich1-6, 1-6
2022-04-21vs PBTC MCCANNWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelanie Turner / Deborah Gove vs Vicki Becker / Kathleen Mattarocci6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGlori Cavin / Sue Ray vs Bristol Lucas / Deanna Stever6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.07 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.28
Glori Cavin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.86
Lanita Lovelace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Deborah Gove
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sue Ray
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glori Cavin + Sue Ray4157% games+3.4% vs expected
Lanita Lovelace + Sue Ray5349% games+3.4% vs expected
Lanita Lovelace + Glori Cavin4946% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Glori Cavin
26W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.28
Lanita Lovelace
15W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Deborah Gove
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Ray
20W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.