Teams

LVTA

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-30vs LTWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Williams / Karen Pielin vs Konnie Kosek / Jo Thomson6-1, 6-2
2021-06-23vs HMTC CRIMSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy King / Karen Pielin vs Becky Olson / Debbie Hansen1-6, 2-6
2021-06-16vs HMTC TURQUOISELost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Williams / Karen Pielin vs Trish Lebsack / Linda Berkheim6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-09vs FCCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy King / Karen Pielin vs Kelly Day / Jane Gronewoller6-4, 7-6
2021-06-02vs TAGWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy King / Karen Pielin vs Becky Buhler / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik6-3, 6-2
2021-05-26vs WYOLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Karen Pielin vs Vicky Kmetz / Pennie Weir1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-05-19vs MLFLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy King / Karen Pielin vs Lorna Coggon / Kathy Petersen6-7, 1-6
2021-05-17vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Pielin / Sue Schneider vs Kathi Freemann / Judy Stout6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-12vs LTLost 01
L#2 DoublesSue Schneider / Karen Pielin vs Jean Darst / Sara Mullarkey2-6, 1-6
2021-05-05vs HMTC CRIMSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy King / Karen Pielin vs Ingrid Parsons / Colleen Muhlbradt6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jill Brooks
published
Dawn Hagen
published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.67
Sue Schneider
published
Linda Seals
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Pielin + Sue Schneider3446% gamesnot enough data
Jill Brooks + Dawn Hagen5255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Brooks
79W–29L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.83
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–99L career · 10 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sue Schneider
11W–34L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Linda Seals
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.