Teams

Sports Mall-Anderson

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 8.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Sorenson / Natalie Fordham vs Cathy Mclevish / Carol Molesky0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJodi Wagner / Kriss Young vs Renae Brooks / Sherree Greenhalgh6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPaula Fuhrman / Crystal Spackman vs Patricia Kipp / Michelle Couderc6-1, 6-3
2022-06-15vs Eccles Tennis Center-MiyaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCrystal Spackman / Maria Brockbank vs Sara Green / Michele van Leeuwen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoey Archer / Jodi Wagner vs Kyra Dunshee / Karen Borski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / April Blessing vs Sandy Adamson / Jeanne Harrison3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-08vs Sunpro-Harlan/MortensenLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoey Archer / Kriss Young vs Nan Black / DeeAnn Edwards3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Brockbank / Crystal Spackman vs Kelly Mortensen / Debi Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / April Blessing vs Susan Christensen / Karen Wilson0-6, 6-7
2022-06-01vs Salt Lake Tennis-RolllinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Alder / Jodi Wagner vs Amy Cutting / Christina Baer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathleen Sorenson / Natalie Fordham vs Cricket Rollins / Christine Lee6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Brockbank / Crystal Spackman vs Susan Mayo / Nancy McNally7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-25vs Brighton High School-SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Alder / April Blessing vs Lee Chase / Marie Goddard6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Sorenson / Natalie Fordham vs Donna Perry / Marcie Nelson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Brockbank / Debbie Hutton vs Simone McInnis / Laura Williams3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKriss Young / Kathleen Sorenson vs Belinda Jensen / Michelle Ainge6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Anderson / Julie Anderson vs Brenda Fowler / Tena Maughan3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Fuhrman / Sarah Hollingsworth vs Susan Groesbeck / Karen Christensen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-04vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoey Archer / Kriss Young vs Renae Brooks / Sherree Greenhalgh7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hutton / Kathleen Sorenson vs Cathy Mclevish / Michelle Couderc6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCrystal Spackman / Paula Fuhrman vs Melanie Vickroy / Shannon Ondeck6-0, 6-1
2022-04-27vs Eccles Tennis Center-MiyaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Sorenson / Joey Archer vs Sara Green / Jan Broadbent7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKriss Young / Linda Alder vs Kelle Jones / Michele van Leeuwen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / Sharon Anderson vs Karen Borski / Kyra Dunshee6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Maria Brockbank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Crystal Spackman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.25
Paula Fuhrman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
April Blessing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Debbie Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Kathleen Sorenson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jodi Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Joey Archer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kriss Young
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Linda Alder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hutton + Kathleen Sorenson4749% games+1.6% vs expected
Linda Alder + Kriss Young7457% games+0.0% vs expected
Paula Fuhrman + April Blessing5946% games−5.3% vs expected
Crystal Spackman + Kriss Young6652% games−10.0% vs expected
Joey Archer + Kathleen Sorenson21042% games−11.2% vs expected
Joey Archer + Kriss Young4256% gamesnot enough data
Linda Alder + Jodi Wagner3355% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Hutton + Kriss Young3247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maria Brockbank
212W–198L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Crystal Spackman
20W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Paula Fuhrman
45W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
April Blessing
22W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Debbie Hutton
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Kathleen Sorenson
46W–94L career · 6 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94
Jodi Wagner
45W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joey Archer
32W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kriss Young
39W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Alder
33W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Anderson
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.