Teams

YMCA:Pagliuca

2022 NH Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-20vs MTS:Taylor:NippeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Brent / Lori Wiechers vs Jason Stadler / Laurie Stadler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDon Reddington / Cynthia Willett vs Cathleen Scharpf / Matthew Zanderigo0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Blum / Marge Pagliuca vs Kelsey Nippe / Jayson Burak7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-13vs YMCA:Gauthier:YankowskasLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Brent / Diane Taft vs Philip Keller / Kremena Star1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Willett / Philip Blum vs David Brown / Nancy Bax6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarsha Baray / Jeffrey Tappin vs Taylor Radke / Dan Varga2-6, 2-6
2022-03-06vs MTS:Taylor:NippeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Wiechers / Philip Blum vs Jason Stadler / Laurie Stadler6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarge Pagliuca / Jeffrey Tappin vs Matthew Zanderigo / Cathleen Scharpf1-6, 2-6
2022-02-27vs YMCA:JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Wiechers / James Brent vs Ying Zhan / Craig Stevens6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Willett / Don Reddington vs Joreen Hendry / Jeremy Shadroui6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarge Pagliuca / Jeffrey Tappin vs Abigail Rogers / Marc Gilman6-2, 6-3
2022-02-20vs EXE:Law:GamacheLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrenda Marcotte / Don Reddington vs Vivien Law / Ryan Gamache5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Taft / James Brent vs Lamia Bosli / Ben Bailey7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarsha Baray / Jeffrey Tappin vs Cynthia Lamarche / Charlie ONeil2-6, 0-6
2022-02-06vs YMCA:Gauthier:YankowskasWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Wiechers / Don Reddington vs Kremena Star / Philip Keller6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Willett / James Brent vs Taylor Radke / Dan Varga6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMarsha Baray / Jeffrey Tappin vs Lindsay Smart / Leo Talbot6-1, 6-1
2022-01-23vs YMCA:JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesDon Reddington / Brenda Marcotte vs Craig Stevens / Ying Zhan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarsha Baray / Raman Chakravarthy vs Jeremy Shadroui / Abigail Rogers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhilip Blum / Shannon Gagnon vs Joe Martin / Lauren Martin6-2, 6-3
2022-01-16vs EXE:Law:GamacheWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Willett / Raman Chakravarthy vs Vivien Law / Denis Vaillancourt6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Taft / James Brent vs Robyn Hudson / Ben Bailey5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Gagnon / Philip Blum vs Lamia Bosli / Charlie ONeil6-1, 7-5
2021-03-14vs YMCA:Gauthier:YankowskasLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarge Pagliuca / Raman Chakravarthy vs Linda Leibig / John Amato5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-02-21vs YMCA:JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesPhilip Keller / Marge Pagliuca vs Ajay Koshy / Lori Wiechers3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRaman Chakravarthy / Ying Zhan vs Allison Ropes / Marc Gilman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Tappin / Pamela Skilton vs Joreen Hendry / Stephen Clough6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Lori Wiechers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
James Brent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.88
Raman Chakravarthy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Cynthia Willett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Brenda Marcotte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Diane Taft
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Marsha Baray
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.28
Marge Pagliuca
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jeffrey Tappin
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Philip Blum
published
Shannon Gagnon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Cappiello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Brent + Diane Taft8744% games−5.7% vs expected
Jeffrey Tappin + Marsha Baray1440% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Tappin + Marge Pagliuca123 matchesnot enough data
James Brent + Cynthia Willett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Wiechers
45W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
James Brent
26W–27L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
Raman Chakravarthy
25W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Cynthia Willett
74W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brenda Marcotte
45W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
Diane Taft
35W–66L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
Marsha Baray
26W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
Marge Pagliuca
55W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.28
Jeffrey Tappin
7W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Philip Blum
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shannon Gagnon
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Cappiello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.